Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949284›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2023

Is more better? The impact of implementing more interventions for hypertension control in a practice facilitation study for small- and medium-sized practices.

Samuel M Ross, Andrew Wang, Lauren Anthony, Stephen D Persell, Jingzhi Yu, Abel N Kho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel M RossCenter for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. samuelmross@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5869-1623
Andrew WangCenter for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lauren AnthonyNorthwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stephen D PersellDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2462-1314
Jingzhi YuCenter for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abel N KhoCenter for Health Information Partnerships, Institute for Public Health & Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Midwest Small Practice Care Transformation Research AllianceR18HS023921 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KHO, ABEL N. · 2015 to 2017
$14.5M
Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MONICA E PEEK · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
IMPROVING OUTCOMES IN US LATINO CHILDRENK08HS000008 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LARA, MARIELENA · 2000 to 2004
–
AHRQ HHS K08 HS000008AHRQ HHS R18 HS023921AHRQ HHS T32 HS000078NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventions for blood pressure (BP) control have positive effects on outcomes for patients with hypertension. Research on these effects in small- and medium-sized practices is limited. Our retrospective analysis used data from Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3), a research program conducted in 2016-2018 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's EvidenceNOW initiative, to examine the impact of implementing more interventions for BP control in these settings. Thirty-eight H3 practices met inclusion criteria and were assigned to an implementer group (high or low) based on the number of interventions implemented with the support of a practice facilitator during the study. Practices in the high-implementer group implemented a mean of 2.2 additional interventions relative to the low-implementer group. Groups were compared on two measures of BP control: (1) mean percentage of hypertensive patients with a most recent BP below 140/90, and (2) mean systolic and diastolic BP of hypertensive patients. In the first measure, practices in the high-implementer group had greater improvement between baseline and the end of the study. Among the 10,150 patients included in the second measure, reductions in mean SBP and DBP were greater for the high-implementer group. These outcomes show that implementing additional interventions had a positive association with measures of BP control, though clinical significance was unknown or limited. Future research is needed to understand the impact of interventions for BP control in small- and medium-sized practices, including the interactions among intervention implementation, practice facilitation, and practice and patient characteristics.

Indexed as

HypertensionBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36949284
PMCPMC10514225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.