Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949251›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of single-agent etoposide intra-CSF chemotherapy in children and young people with relapsed/refractory central nervous system tumours.

Anna Butler, Lisethe Meijer, Jo-Fen Liu, Manjit Chohan, Ibrahim Jalloh, Donald Macarthur, Margaret Parr, Sophie Wilne, Shaun Wilson, David Walker and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna ButlerNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Lisethe MeijerDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, Princess Maxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jo-Fen LiuChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RG, UK.
Manjit ChohanNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Ibrahim JallohCambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Donald MacarthurNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Margaret ParrNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Sophie WilneNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Shaun WilsonOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
David WalkerChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RG, UK.
Richard GrundyNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Madhumita DandapaniNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. madhumita.dandapani@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBBrain Tumour Research · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of the project was to evaluate intra-CSF etoposide administration in a palliative setting for children and young people with relapsed/refractory central nervous system (CNS) tumours, with the primary endpoints being overall survival and progression-free survival time. A safety endpoint was to assess the side effect profile and complications of intra-CSF etoposide.

methodsThirty-five patients under the age of 30 years (median age: 5.33 years) were enrolled onto the project. The cross-centre study was a service evaluation, with a data collection spreadsheet designed in Nottingham and completed by both Nottingham and Oxford centres. Data was analysed using SPSS, assessing the overall survival and progression-free survival times, as well as the 6-month and 1-year survival rates.

resultsThe median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 10.97 and 5.91 months, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year overall survival rates were 67% and 48%, and the progression-free survival rates were 50% and 22%. Age at the start of intra-CSF therapy was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.046), with the 6 + age group having improved overall survival. Treatment type was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.012), with etoposide intra-CSF treatment being associated with improved overall survival. Treatment duration was significantly associated with both overall survival (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001).

conclusionIntra-CSF etoposide treatment has shown to increase both overall and progression-free survival significantly, whilst having few side effects and maintaining a good quality of life for patients, reflecting it as a beneficial therapy in the palliative setting.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolEtoposideHumansProgression-Free SurvivalEtoposideBlood braian barrierCentral nervous system tumoursChemotherapyIntra CSF etoposideProgression-free survivalRelpase

Identifiers

PMID36949251
PMCPMC10227148
OpenAlexW4353029241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.