Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36949232›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Shifting towards optimized healthy and sustainable Dutch diets: impact on protein quality.

Samantha N Heerschop, Argyris Kanellopoulos, Sander Biesbroek, Pieter van 't Veer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Toward healthy and sustainable diets for the 21st century: Importance of sociocultural and economic considerations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha N HeerschopDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Postbox 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands. samantha.heerschop@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-7308
Argyris KanellopoulosOperations Research and Logistics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-6178
Sander BiesbroekDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Postbox 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9934-0969
Pieter van 't VeerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Postbox 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9708-3513

Funding

Nederlandse Zuivel Organisatie SHARP-next seeding project (contract 2020-2021)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo reduce the environmental impact of Western diets, a reduction of meat consumption and a substitution by plant-based protein sources is needed. This protein transition will affect the quantity and quality of dietary protein. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the protein adequacy of diets optimized for nutritional health and diet-related greenhouse gas emission (GHGE).

methodsData from 2150 adult participants of the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey were used, with diet assessed using two non-consecutive 24 h dietary recalls. Utilizable protein of current diets per day was based on meal composition and the Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score and was compared to protein requirements. Optimized diets were derived as linear combinations of current diets that minimized GHGE and maximized the Dutch Healthy Diet 2015 score, with/without constraints to keep dietary change within 33% of current consumption. Protein adequacy was evaluated in both current and optimized diets.

resultsIn all age and gender strata, the healthiest diets had higher GHGE, the most sustainable diets had the lowest dietary quality, though higher than current diets, and protein adequacy remained sufficient. When limiting dietary change to 33% of current consumption, in the most promising trade-off diet GHGE was reduced by 12-16%. The current diet provided 1.4-2.2 times the required amount of utilizable protein.

conclusionThese results suggest that a realistic aim for the next decade might be to reduce diet-related GHGE to 12-16% of the current levels without compromising protein adequacy and diet quality. To achieve global targets, upstream food system transformations are needed with subsequent dietary changes.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeGreenhouse GasesAdultDietDiet, HealthyEnvironmentHumansGreenhouse GasesDiet optimizationDutch dietsMeal-based approachProtein qualityProtein transitionSustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID36949232
PMCPMC10349729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.