Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36948567›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Optimising psychological treatment for pain after breast cancer: a factorial design study protocol in Denmark.

Cecilie Buskbjerg, Mia Skytte O'Toole, Robert Zachariae, Anders Bonde Jensen, Yoon Frederiksen, Christoffer Johansen, Annika von Heymann, Anne Speckens, Maja Johannsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05444101 (Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444101 naunknown statusnot on this map

Optimizing Psychological Treatment for Pain After Breast Cancer: A Factorial Design Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2022 to 2024Enrolled185ConditionsPain, Chronic, Breast CancerArmsMindful attention, Decentering, Values and committed action
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilie BuskbjergDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark cdrc@psy.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-8973
Mia Skytte O'TooleDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Robert ZachariaeDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders Bonde JensenDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Yoon FrederiksenDeparment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9318-5689
Christoffer JohansenCASTLE Cancer Late Effects Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annika von HeymannCASTLE Cancer Late Effects Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0900-5575
Anne SpeckensDepartment of Psychiatry, Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5266-1554
Maja JohannsenDepartment of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne in five breast cancer (BC) survivors are affected by persistent pain years after completing primary treatment. While the efficacy of psychological interventions for BC-related pain has been documented in several meta-analyses, reported effect sizes are generally modest, pointing to a need for optimisation. Guided by the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, the present study aims to optimise psychological treatment for BC-related pain by identifying active treatment components in a full factorial design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study uses a 2×3 factorial design, randomising 192 women with BC-related pain (18-75 years) to eight experimental conditions. The eight conditions consist of three contemporary cognitive-behavioural therapy components, namely: (1) mindful attention, (2) decentring, and (3) values and committed action. Each component is delivered in two sessions, and each participant will receive either zero, two, four or six sessions. Participants receiving two or three treatment components will be randomised to receive them in varying order. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T1), session by session, every day for 6 days following the first session in each treatment component, at post-intervention (T2) and at 12-week follow-up (T3). Primary outcomes are pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale) and pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory interference subscale) from T1 to T2. Secondary outcomes are pain burden, pain quality, pain frequency, pain catastrophising, psychological distress, well-being and fear of cancer recurrence. Possible mediators include mindful attention, decentring, and pain acceptance and activity engagement. Possible moderators are treatment expectancy, treatment adherence, satisfaction with treatment and therapeutic alliance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for the present study was received from the Central Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (no: 1-10-72-309-40). Findings will be made available to the study funders, care providers, patient organisations and other researchers at international conferences, and published in international, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05444101).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChronic PainCognitive Behavioral TherapyDenmarkFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBreast tumoursCancer painPAIN MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID36948567
PMCPMC10040060
OpenAlexW4353098867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.