Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36948566›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Social support, distress and well-being in individuals experiencing Long-COVID: a cross-sectional survey study.

Janina Lüscher, Urte Scholz, Walter Bierbauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychosocial Aspects of the Lived Experience of Long COVID: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janina LüscherSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland janina.luescher@paraplegie.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-2453-1925
Urte ScholzDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Walter BierbauerDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHSwiss Paraplegic Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIncreasingly attention of the COVID-19 pandemic is directed towards its long-term effects, also known as Long-COVID. So far, Long-COVID was examined mainly from a medical perspective, leaving psychosocial effects of Long-COVID understudied. The present study advances the current literature by examining social support in the context of Long-COVID. The study not only examines received support reported by individuals with Long-COVID, but also provided support reported by relatives of individuals with Long-COVID.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThe study was conducted from June to October 2021 in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland.

participantsWe examined 256 individuals with Long-COVID (M PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were positive and negative affect, anxiety and depressive symptoms and perceived stress.

resultsFor individuals with Long-COVID, receiving emotional support was related to higher well-being (positive affect: b=0.29, p<0.01; negative affect: b=-0.31, p<0.05) and less distress (anxiety: b=-1.45, p<0.01; depressive symptoms: b=-1.04, p<0.05; perceived stress: b=-0.21, p<0.05) but no effects emerged for receiving practical support. For relatives of individuals with Long-COVID, providing emotional support was only related to lower depressive symptoms (b=-2.57, p<0.05). Again, provided practical support was unrelated to the outcomes considered.

conclusionsEmotional support is likely to play an important role in well-being and distress of patients and relatives, whereas practical support does not seem to make a difference. Future research should clarify under what conditions different kinds of support unfold their positive effects on well-being and distress in the context of Long-COVID.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSocial SupportCOVID-19depression & mood disorderspublic health

Identifiers

PMID36948566
PMCPMC10039976
OpenAlexW4353098864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.