Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36948557›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Indwelling experience and coping strategies of upper arm infusion ports in patients with cancer: a qualitative study.

Yawen Wang, Xiyi Wang, Xiaoxia Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yawen WangSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4435-8480
Xiyi WangSchool of Nursing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoxia QiuSchool of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China qiuxiaoxia1003@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe upper arm infusion ports have been proven to be advanced and safe, but the experience from the perspective of patients is lacking. This study explored the indwelling experience and coping strategies of upper arm infusion ports in patients with cancer.

designQualitative exploratory study.

settingThis study was conducted between May 2021 and August 2021 at a level III-A general hospital in Shanghai, China.

participantsThe participants, who are patients with cancer implanted with the upper arm infusion ports, included 10 women and 6 men, and the average age was 54.4±8.3 years old.

methodsData were selected from semistructured in-depth interviews and analysed by thematic analysis.

resultsThere were 10 descriptive topics and 4 analytical topics in 2 parts. The indwelling experience includes positive experience (treatment benefit, life convenience) and negative experience (physical discomfort, social anxiety, psychological distress). Coping strategies include emotional-focused strategies (self-acceptance, avoidance and self-protection) and problem-focused strategies (information seeking, functional exercise and remove as soon as possible).

conclusionThe infusion port in the upper arm is beneficial to the safety and quality of life of patients with cancer. At the same time, there are challenges in physical, psychological and social adaptation. Patients respond with some measures, but obstacles may arise during implementation.

Indexed as

ArmNeoplasmsAdaptation, PsychologicalChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeAdult oncologyQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36948557
PMCPMC10040049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.