Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947560›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Is bovine density and ownership associated with human tuberculosis in India?

Katriina Willgert, Susie da Silva, Ruoran Li, Premanshu Dandapat, Maroudam Veerasami, Hindol Maity, Mohan Papanna, Sreenidhi Srinivasan, James L N Wood, Vivek Kapur and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katriina WillgertDisease Dynamics Unit (DDU), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3586-1997
Susie da SilvaDisease Dynamics Unit (DDU), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ruoran LiDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Premanshu DandapatICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Maroudam VeerasamiCisGen Biotech Discoveries Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India.
Hindol MaityCisGen Biotech Discoveries Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India.
Mohan PapannaHuck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
Sreenidhi SrinivasanHuck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
James L N WoodDisease Dynamics Unit (DDU), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0258-3188
Vivek KapurHuck Institutes of Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
Andrew J K ConlanDisease Dynamics Unit (DDU), Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBPennsylvania State University · USBiotech Park · INHarvard University · USIndian Veterinary Research Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoonotic tuberculosis in humans is caused by infection with bacteria of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex acquired from animals, most commonly cattle. India has the highest burden of human tuberculosis in the world and any zoonotic risk posed by tuberculosis in bovines needs to be managed at the source of infection as a part of efforts to end human tuberculosis. Zoonotic tuberculosis in humans can be severe and is clinically indistinguishable from non-zoonotic tuberculosis. As a consequence, zoonotic tuberculosis remains under-recognised and the significance of its contribution to human tuberculosis is poorly understood. This study aimed to explore any association between bovine density, bovine ownership, and human tuberculosis reporting in India using self-reported tuberculosis data in households and officially reported tuberculosis cases while controlling for common confounders for human tuberculosis. We find an association between human tuberculosis reporting, bovine density and bovine ownership in India. Buffalo density was significantly associated with an increased risk of self-reported tuberculosis in households (odds ratio (OR) = 1.23 (95% credible interval (CI): 1.10-1.39) at household level; incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.04-1.33) at district level), while cattle density (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89; IRR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.70-0.87) and ownership of bovines in households (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.9-0.99; IRR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.79) had a protective association with tuberculosis reporting. It is unclear whether this relates to differences in tuberculosis transmission dynamics, or perhaps an association between bovines and other unexplored confounders for tuberculosis reporting in humans. Our study highlights a need for structured surveillance to estimate the prevalence of tuberculosis in cattle and buffaloes, characterisation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species present in bovines and transmission analyses at the human-animal interface to better assess the burden and risk pathways of zoonotic tuberculosis in India.

Indexed as

BisonMycobacterium bovisTuberculosisTuberculosis, BovineAnimalsBuffaloesCattleHumansIndiaOwnership

Identifiers

PMID36947560
PMCPMC10032477
OpenAlexW4353018883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC0
measurements read24
identifiers read10
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.