Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947531›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Human scent signature on cartridge case survives gun being fired: A preliminary study on a potential of scent residues as an identification tool.

Nikola Ladislavová, Petra Pojmanová, Pavel Vrbka, Jana Šnupárková, Štěpán Urban

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikola LadislavováFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Analytical Chemistry, UCT Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-4780
Petra PojmanováFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Analytical Chemistry, UCT Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel VrbkaFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Physical Chemistry, UCT Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana ŠnupárkováFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Mathematics, UCT Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Štěpán UrbanFaculty of Chemical Engineering, Department of Analytical Chemistry, UCT Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper focuses on a chemical analysis of human scent samples that were obtained from cartridge cases after being fired and their comparison with scent samples collected under laboratory conditions. Scent samples were analyzed by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with the time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The results obtained from the chemical analyzes confirmed the desired stability of the human scent evidence and outlined the possible application for forensic purposes. The qualitative results of the study converge with the findings of previous studies on the composition of human scent and the chemical composition of human fingerprints. Furthermore, statistical analyzes were performed employing similarity algorithms such as Pearson's and Spearman's correlations, or Kendall's tau. The resulting comparison of the scent samples secured on fired cartridge cases compared with those samples collected under laboratory conditions yielded ten out of ten correct identifications of the scent inflictor.

Indexed as

Forensic MedicineOdorantsChromatography, GasHumansPheromonesPheromones

Identifiers

PMID36947531
PMCPMC10032514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read30
identifiers read11
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.