Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947521›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

A non-randomized clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel sperm sex selection technique.

Stephanie Cheung, Rony Elias, Philip Xie, Zev Rosenwaks, Gianpiero D Palermo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05500573 (Sex Selection of Human Spermatozoa), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05500573 narecruitingnot on this map

Sex Selection of Human Spermatozoa

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2013 to 2029Enrolled2,000ConditionsInfertility, IVFArmsSperm Sorting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie CheungThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Rony EliasThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Philip XieThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Zev RosenwaksThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Gianpiero D PalermoThe Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-4560
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The desire to have offspring of a specific sex has a long history but has been particularly present with the appearance of assisted reproduction. However, embryo selection raises ethical concerns. Thus, several techniques to select sex-specific spermatozoa have been proposed but carry limitations. There are many variations of each technique, and some are time consuming and costly. Concerns about effectiveness and safety have also rendered many of them unappealing. Therefore, we propose a novel sperm sex selection technique (SST) that appears to be consistently safe and effective. A single-center, non-randomized clinical trial was designed. We included 1,317 couples, who were assigned to one of two groups: ICSI/PGTA or ICSI/PGTA+GS. Ejaculates from male partners of couples in the ICSI/PGTA+GS group (n = 105) were processed using SST to enrich spermatozoa for their desired sex. Standard sperm processing was carried out for couples undergoing PGT-A solely for aneuploidy (n = 1,212), comprising the ICSI/PGTA control group. To validate the efficacy of our technique, we performed an analysis on spermatozoa pre- and post-selection, followed by an assessment of the proportion of the conceptuses' sex to confirm clinical reliability. We also followed up on ICSI clinical outcomes and child/newborn health to establish the safety of our method. Our main outcome measures included the proportion of spermatozoa and embryos enriched for female and male sex, as well as embryo euploidy rates and ICSI clinical outcomes. These outcomes were compared between the two groups. For the ICSI/PGTA group (n = 1,212) (maternal age, 37.0±4yrs; paternal age, 39.1±6yrs), with ejaculated spermatozoa processed in the standard fashion, 2,303 ICSI cycles (1.2±1) yielded an 81.0% (14,375/17,737) fertilization. PGT-A results indicated a euploidy rate of 73.1% (n = 3,718) for female and 72.4% (n = 3,054) for male embryos. These couples achieved a 76.4% (699/915) implantation and 65.2% (597/915) clinical pregnancy rate, with 551 deliveries (48.5% female, 51.5% male). All 105 men in the ICSI/PGTA+GS group had sperm specimens with an equal sex distribution at baseline. Of them, 59 (paternal age, 40.9±6yrs) who desired female offspring obtained an 81.6% enrichment after SST. They underwent 73 ICSI cycles with their partners (maternal age, 37.9±4yrs), achieving a 77.3% (583/754) fertilization. This resulted in 79.1% (231/292) female embryos that generated a 79.3% (23/29) implantation rate, with 16 singleton deliveries of the desired female sex without major or minor congenital malformations. Forty-six couples (maternal age, 37.3±4yrs; paternal age, 40.7±6yrs) desiring male offspring obtained an 80.8% sperm sex enrichment. They underwent 50 ICSI cycles, achieving a 75.4% (462/613) fertilization and equivalent proportion of male embryos (223/280, 79.6%). Their implantation was 90.5% (19/21), with 13 singleton deliveries of healthy male offspring. Furthermore, 78.8% (182/231) of female and 66.4% (148/223) of male embryos from the ICSI/PGTA+GS cohort were euploid. These euploid rates were comparable to those from the ICSI/PGTA group. In couples undergoing ICSI with PGT-A, SST consistently enriched spermatozoa, resulting in a higher proportion of embryos and thus offspring of the desired sex. Moreover, SST did not impair the fertilization or embryo developmental competence of spermatozoa, nor did it affect offspring health. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05500573.

Indexed as

Sex PreselectionSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RateReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSemenSpermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID36947521
PMCPMC10032484
OpenAlexW4353020463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read79
identifiers read9
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.