ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2023
Determinants of a decline in a nutrition risk measure differ by baseline high nutrition risk status: targeting nutrition risk screening for frailty prevention in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNutrition risk is a key component of frailty and screening, and treatment of nutrition risk is part of frailty management. This study identified the determinants of a 3-year decline in nutrition risk (measured by SCREEN-8) for older adults stratified by risk status at baseline.
methodsSecondary data analysis of the comprehensive cohort sample of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) (n = 5031) with complete data for covariates at baseline and 3-year follow-up. Using a conceptual model to define covariates, determinants of a change in nutrition risk score as measured by SCREEN-8 (lower score indicates greater risk) were identified for those not at risk at baseline and those at high risk at baseline using multivariable regression.
resultsModels stratified by baseline nutrition risk were significant. Notable factors associated with a decrease in SCREEN-8 for those not at risk at baseline were mental health diagnoses (- 0.83; CI [- 1.44, -0.22]), living alone at follow-up (- 1.98; CI [- 3.40, -0.56]), and lack of dental care at both timepoints (- 0.91; CI [- 1.62, -0.20]) and at follow-up only (- 1.32; CI [- 2.45, -0.19]). For those at high nutrition risk at baseline, decline in activities of daily living (- 2.56; CI [- 4.36, -0.77]) and low chair-rise scores (- 1.98; CI [- 3.33, - 0.63]) were associated with lower SCREEN-8 scores at follow-up.
conclusionDeterminants of change in SCREEN-8 scores are different for those with no risk and those who are already at high risk, suggesting targeted approaches are needed for screening and treatment of nutrition risk in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.