Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947309›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2024

Integrating the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) into a Culturally Responsive Evaluation (CRE) Approach to Conduct Mixed-Method Evaluations of Diabetes Prevention and Management Programs Reaching Underresourced Populations and Communities.

Sara R Jacobs, LaShawn Glasgow, Peter Amico, Kimberly D Farris, Gia Rutledge, Bryce D Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How Can Implementation Science Advance Behavioral Interventions in Preschool? A Scoping Review and Recommendations.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  5. Preventing and Managing Chronic Disease Through Implementation Science: Editor's Introduction to the Supplemental Issue.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sara R JacobsRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
LaShawn GlasgowRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Peter AmicoAmico Consulting, Orlando, FL, USA.
Kimberly D FarrisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. KFarris2@cdc.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-5279-6704
Gia RutledgeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bryce D SmithCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a significant population health threat. Evidence-based interventions, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Diabetes Prevention Program and diabetes self-management education and support programs, can help prevent, delay, or manage the disease. However, participation is suboptimal, especially among populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. Evaluations of programs reaching populations who are medically underserved or people with lower incomes can help elucidate how best to tailor evidence-based interventions, but it is also important for evaluations to account for cultural and contextual factors. Culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) is a framework for centering an evaluation in the culture of the programs being evaluated. We integrated CRE with implementation and outcome constructs from the Adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to ensure that the evaluation produced useful evidence for putting evidence-based diabetes interventions to use in real-world settings, reaching populations who are at an increased risk of developing diabetes. The paper provides an overview of how we integrated CRE and CFIR approaches to conduct mixed-methods evaluations of evidence-based diabetes interventions.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHumansImplementation ScienceProgram EvaluationCulturally responsive evaluationDiabetes prevention and managementImplementation scienceMixed-methods evaluations

Identifiers

PMID36947309
PMCPMC11073471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.