Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947293›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Simultaneous hernia repair following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is safe with low rates of mesh-related complications.

Abdel Rahman Jaber, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Travis Rogers, Shady Saikali, Roshane Perera, D Grant Loy, Marco Sandri, Shannon Roof, Keila Diaz, Carlos Ortiz and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inguinal hernia repair in patients with artificial urinary sphincter after radical prostatectomy.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abdel Rahman Jaber *AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA. Asjaber@hotmail.com.
Marcio Covas Moschovas *AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Travis RogersAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Shady SaikaliAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Roshane PereraUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
D Grant LoyUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Marco SandriBig and Open Data Innovation Laboratory (BODaI-Lab) and Data Methods and Systems Statistical, Milan, Italy.
Shannon RoofAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Keila DiazAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Carlos OrtizAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
Vipul PatelAdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, 380 Celebration Place, Orlando, FL, 34747, USA.
AdventHealth Celebration · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the gold-standard treatment for localized prostate cancer in the USA. However, performing RARP along with a concomitant hernia repair with mesh is debatable because of the lack of well-designed studies on this subject. Some argue that this procedure may result in mesh infections and increased complications due to possible contact of mesh and urine. This study reports our experience with simultaneous hernia repair with mesh placement in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. We compared 244 patients (from August 2008 to August 2021) who underwent RARP with concomitant hernia repair (inguinal, umbilical, and ventral) and mesh placement with 244 patients from 6275 RARPs operated on the same period without hernia repair. We performed a propensity score matching analysis using preoperative covariates and compared the perioperative outcomes, and complications in 90 days after surgery. Median follow-up was 36.6 months for the control and hernia groups respectively (p = 0.81). Eighty-three patients had unilateral inguinal hernia repair, 22 had a bilateral inguinal hernia repair, 95 had a ventral hernia repair, and 44 had an umbilical hernia repair. The median operative time was 112 min for the control group and 160 min for hernia groups (p < 0.001). We did not find statistically significant differences in minor complications (Clavien ≤ 2). Although the postoperative readmissions in 90-days were higher in the hernia group (18 vs. 7, p = 0.038), none was associated with mesh complications. Limitation includes the retrospective design of the study. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with simultaneous hernia repair and mesh placement is safe and does not increase complications related to the mesh. In our experience, hernia repair increases the operative time, usually due to initial peritoneal flap dissection and final suturing. Therefore, we believe that hernia repair with mesh during RARP is safe and spares patients the additional impacts of an additional surgical procedure.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshHernia repairMesh infectionRadical prostatectomyRobotic assisted

Identifiers

PMID36947293
OpenAlexW4353015323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.