Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947291›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2023

Revisiting and redefining return rate for determination of the precise growth status of a species.

Ayan Paul, Neelakshi Chatterjee, Sabyasachi Bhattacharya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayan PaulAgricultural and Ecological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203, B. T. Road, Kolkata, 700108, India.
Neelakshi ChatterjeeDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, 2600 Clifton Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45221, USA.
Sabyasachi BhattacharyaAgricultural and Ecological Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203, B. T. Road, Kolkata, 700108, India. sabyabhatta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6432-6988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth curve models play an instrumental role in quantifying the growth of biological processes and have immense practical applications across all disciplines. The most popular growth metric to capture the species fitness is the "Relative Growth Rate" in this domain. The different growth laws, such as exponential, logistic, Gompertz, power, and generalized Gompertz or generalized logistic, can be characterized based on the monotonic behavior of the relative growth rate (RGR) to size or time. Thus, in this case, species fitness can be determined truly through RGR. However, in nature, RGR is often non-monotonic and specifically bell-shaped, especially in the situation when a species is adapting to a new environment [1]. In this case, species may experience with the same fitness (RGR) for two different time points. The species precise growth and maturity status cannot be determined from this RGR function. The instantaneous maturity rate (IMR), as proposed by [2], helps to determine the correct maturity status of the species. Nevertheless, the metric IMR suffers from severe drawbacks; (i) IMR is intractable for all non-integer values of a specific parameter. (ii) The measure depends on a model parameter. The mathematical expression of IMR possesses the term "carrying capacity" which is unknown to the experimenter. (iii) Note that for identifying the precise growth status of a species, it is also necessary to understand its response when the populations are deflected from their equilibrium position at carrying capacity. This is an established concept in population biology, popularly known as the return rate. However, IMR does not provide information on the species deflection rate at the steady state. Hence, we propose a new growth measure connected with the species return rate, termed the "reverse of relative of relative growth rate" (henceforth, RRRGR), which is treated as a proxy for the IMR, having similar mathematical properties. Finally, we introduce a stochastic RRRGR model for specifying precise species growth and status of maturity. We illustrate the model through numerical simulations and real fish data. We believe that this study would be helpful for fishery biologists in regulating the favorable conditions of growth so that the species can reach a steady state with optimum effort.

Indexed as

Growth and DevelopmentModels, BiologicalAnimalsAsymptotic distributionInstantaneous maturity rateRelative growth rateReverse of relative of relative growth rateStochasticityUnification

Identifiers

PMID36947291
PMCPMC10160304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.