ArticleDer Nervenarzt2023
[Experiences of dangerous situations in psychiatry and psychotherapy involving patients with extremist attitudes].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDangerous situations in connection with the treatment of persons with suspected extremist attitudes have become increasingly relevant. A survey of physicians and psychotherapists is intended to provide information about concrete dangerous situations among these patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsBy means of an anonymous online survey, which comprised 16 main questions and up to 95 additional questions, a total of 364 health professionals were asked about the general situation and about patients, as well as relatives with suspected extremist attitudes.
resultsIn all, 17.5% of the participants were physicians, 72.1% psychotherapists. 47.7% work exclusively in a hospital, 34.2% in a private practice. A total of 57.7% of the participants have already treated patients with suspected extremist attitudes (46.7% treated relatives); 27.6% were confronted with situations of self-endangerment (30.1% in the case of relatives), 49.5% with situations of danger to others (18.3% in the case of relatives), in which they often did not feel safe. Altogether, 20.3% of the professionals informed security authorities, and not quite half found this contact to be comparatively unhelpful/not at all helpful (45.5% among relatives). The majority of the participants had no contact to other agencies, such as specialized counselling centres for deradicalization. Physicians experienced the situations of endangerment more often than non-medical psychotherapists. A comparison between professionals from hospitals and private practices shows no significant differences. DISCUSSION: The study was able to show that extremism and the associated dangerous situations are an important topic in the treatment of patients and that physicians and non-medical psychotherapists should be well prepared. Networking with extremism prevention agencies and good cooperation with security authorities would be important and desirable for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.