Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947204›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Transplant renal artery stenosis: utilization of machine learning to identify ancillary sonographic and doppler parameters to predict stenosis in patients with graft dysfunction.

Yamile Blain, Francesco Alessandrino, Eduardo Scortegagna, Patricia Balcacer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Deep-learning-based renal artery stenosis diagnosis via multimodal fusion.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yamile BlainDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami Health System, 1611 NW 12th Ave, West Wing 279, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. yxb280@miami.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4331-7326
Francesco AlessandrinoDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami Health System, 1611 NW 12th Ave, West Wing 279, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Eduardo ScortegagnaDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami Health System, 1611 NW 12th Ave, West Wing 279, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Patricia BalcacerDepartment of Radiology, University of Miami Health System, 1611 NW 12th Ave, West Wing 279, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine if ancillary sonographic and Doppler parameters can be used to predict transplant renal artery stenosis in patients with renal graft dysfunction. MATERIALS AND

methodsIRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study included 80 renal transplant patients who had renal US followed by renal angiogram between January 2018 and December 2019. A consensus read of two radiologists recorded these parameters: peak systolic velocity, persistence of elevated velocity, grayscale narrowing, parvus tardus, delayed systolic upstroke, angle of the systolic peak (SP angle), and aliasing. Univariate analysis using t-test or chi-square was performed to determine differences between patients with and without stenosis. P values under 0.05 were deemed statistically significant. We used machine learning algorithms to determine parameters that could better predict the presence of stenosis. The algorithms included logistic regression, random forest, imbalanced random forest, boosting, and CART. All 80 cases were split between training and testing using stratified sampling using a 75:25 split.

resultsWe found a statistically significant difference in grayscale narrowing (p = 0.0010), delayed systolic upstroke (p = 0.0002), SP angle (p = 0.0005), and aliasing (p = 0.0024) between the two groups. No significant difference was found for an elevated peak systolic velocity (p = 0.1684). The imbalanced random forest (IRF) model was selected for improved accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Specificity, sensitivity, AUC, and normalized Brier score for the IRF model using all parameters were 73%, 81%, 0.82, and 69 in the training set, and 78%, 58%, 0.78, and 80 in the testing set. VIMP assessment showed that the combination of variables that resulted in the most significant change of the training set performance was that of grayscale narrowing and SP angle.

conclusionElevated peak systolic velocity did not discriminate between patients with and without TRAS. Adding ancillary parameters into the machine learning algorithm improved specificity and sensitivity similarly in the training and testing sets. The algorithm identified the combination of lumen narrowing coupled with the angle of the systolic peak as better predictor of TRAS. This model may improve the accuracy of ultrasound for transplant renal artery stenosis.

Indexed as

Renal Artery ObstructionConstriction, PathologicHumansKidneyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, DopplerDoppler ultrasoundMachine learningRenal transplantTransplant renal artery stenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.