ReviewHNO2023
[Primary salivary gland tumors from a pathology perspective : Morphomolecular peculiarities and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges].
Review in HNO, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Similar to tumors of other organs, salivary gland neoplasms were historically viewed as a single neoplastic entity and mostly treated as such. Accordingly, only the clinical tumor stage, and not the histological subtype, was considered to be of significant prognostic impact. However, over the years, several distinct sub-entities have been characterized based on morphological features, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and salivary duct carcinoma. Most importantly, the nosology of salivary gland carcinomas has undergone a dynamic "splitting" on the basis of morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics, so that 21 independent carcinomas are now listed in the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Moreover, it has become evident that splitting of these carcinoma subtypes no longer represents a "pathologist's hobby," but carries significant prognostic and therapeutic relevance for optimized cancer surgery and potentially systemic therapy. The current review summarizes the major features of salivary gland tumors, both benign and malignant, and gives an account of their classification systems and genetic profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36947199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.