ArticleEuropean journal of preventive cardiology2023
Masters athlete screening study (MASS): incidence of cardiovascular disease and major adverse cardiac events and efficacy of screening over five years.
Article in European journal of preventive cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary Artery Disease in Masters Athletes: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Pooled it
- Exercise-Induced Coronary Remodeling and the Atherosclerotic Paradox in Endurance Athletes: Toward a Unified Mechanobiological Framework.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Athletes - State-of-the-Art Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2026Review
- Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery disease in master athletes with ST-segment depression or high-risk premature ventricular beats at pre-participation exercise testing.European heart journal open · 2025Article
- The diagnostic accuracy of contemporary ECG interpretation criteria in risk stratification of master athletes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiac Screening in Athletes: Current Status and Future Challenges.Open access journal of sports medicine · 2025Review
- Preparticipation Cardiovascular Screening of Athletes: Current Controversies and Challenges for the Future.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Assessing athletes beyond routine screening: Incorporating essential factors to optimize cardiovascular health and performance.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Biological sex does not influence the peak cardiac output response to twelve weeks of sprint interval training.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Study of Morpho-Functional Characteristics of the Cardiovascular System According to Electrocardiography, Phonocardiography, Echocardiography in Masters Athletics.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of cardiovascular screening in Masters athletes (MAs) (≥35 y), and whether screening decreases their risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) is unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of yearly cardiovascular screening, and the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and MACE over five years. METHODS AND
resultsMAs (≥35 y) without previous history of CVD underwent yearly cardiovascular screening. Participants with an abnormal screen underwent further evaluations. In the initial year, 798 MAs (62.7% male, 55 ± 10 y) were screened; 11.4% (n = 91) were diagnosed with CVD. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was the most common diagnosis (n = 64; 53%). During follow-up, there were an additional 89 CVD diagnoses with an incidence rate of 3.58/100, 4.14/100, 3.74/100, 1.19/100, for years one to four, respectively. The most common diagnoses during follow-up were arrhythmias (n = 33; 37%). Increasing age (OR = 1.047, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003-1.094; P = 0.0379), Framingham Risk Score (FRS) (OR = 1.092, 95% CI: 1.031-1.158; P = 0.003), and LDL cholesterol (OR = 1.709, 95% CI: 1.223-2.401; P = 0.002) were predictive of CAD, whereas moderate intensity activity (min/wk) (OR = 0.997, 95% CI: 0.996-0.999; P = 0.002) was protective. Ten MACE (2.8/1000 athlete-years) occurred. All of these MAs were male, and 90% had ≥10% FRS. All underwent further evaluations with only two identified to have obstructive CAD.
conclusionMACE occurred despite yearly screening. All MAs who had an event had an abnormal screen; however, cardiac functional tests failed to detect underlying CAD in most cases. It may be appropriate to offer computed coronary tomography angiography in MAs with ≥10% FRS to overcome the limitations of functional testing, and to assist with lifestyle and treatment modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.