Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947142›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Isolation and Quarantine for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the United States, 2020-2022.

John E Oeltmann, Divya Vohra, Holly H Matulewicz, Nickolas DeLuca, Jonathan P Smith, Chandra Couzens, R Ryan Lash, Barrington Harvey, Melissa Boyette, Alicia Edwards and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Case Report: Retrospective discovery ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John E OeltmannUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Divya VohraHealth Division, Mathematica, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Holly H MatulewiczHealth Division, Mathematica, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Nickolas DeLucaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jonathan P SmithSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Chandra CouzensHealth Division, Mathematica, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
R Ryan LashUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Barrington HarveyUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Melissa BoyetteUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alicia EdwardsUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Philip M TalboyUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Odessa DuboseUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Paul ReganUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Penny LoosierUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Elise CarusoUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Dolores J KatzUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Melanie M TaylorUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Patrick K MoonanUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMathematica Policy Research · USYale University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic health programs varied in ability to reach people with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their contacts to encourage separation from others. For both adult case patients with COVID-19 and their contacts, we estimated the impact of contact tracing activities on separation behaviors from January 2020 until March 2022.

methodsWe used a probability-based panel survey of a nationally representative sample to gather data for estimates and comparisons.

resultsAn estimated 64 255 351 adults reported a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test result; 79.6% isolated for ≥5 days, 60.2% isolated for ≥10 days, and 79.2% self-notified contacts. A total of, 24 057 139 (37.7%) completed a case investigation, and 46.2% of them reported contacts to health officials. More adults who completed a case investigation isolated than those who did not complete a case investigation (≥5 days, 82.6% vs 78.2%, respectively; ≥10 days, 69.8% vs 54.8%; both P < .05). A total of 84 946 636 adults were contacts of a COVID-19 case patient. Of these, 73.1% learned of their exposure directly from a case patient; 49.4% quarantined for ≥5 days, 18.7% quarantined for ≥14 days, and 13.5% completed a contact tracing call. More quarantined among those who completed a contact tracing call than among those who did not complete a tracing call (≥5 days, 61.2% vs 48.5%, respectively; ≥14 days, 25.2% vs 18.0%; both P < .05).

conclusionsEngagement in contact tracing was positively correlated with isolation and quarantine. However, most adults with COVID-19 isolated and self-notified contacts regardless of whether the public health workforce was able to reach them. Identifying and reaching contacts was challenging and limited the ability to promote quarantining, and testing.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient IsolationQuarantineAdolescentAdultAgedContact TracingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adultcontact tracingCOVID-19isolationquarantine

Identifiers

PMID36947142
PMCPMC11094624
OpenAlexW4330334923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.