Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36947046›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

PhacoTrainer: Deep Learning for Cataract Surgical Videos to Track Surgical Tools.

Hsu-Hang Yeh, Anjal M Jain, Olivia Fox, Kostya Sebov, Sophia Y Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence in Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Integration of Trackerless Surface Reconstruction-Based Surgical Navigation With Exoscopic Trans-Mastoid Surgery.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hsu-Hang YehDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Anjal M JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Olivia FoxKrieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kostya SebovDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sophia Y WangDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USStanford University · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Hu · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Personalized Predictions for Glaucoma Progression Using Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Health RecordsK23EY032635 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SOPHIA YING · 2021 to 2025
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to build a deep-learning model that automatically analyzes cataract surgical videos for the locations of surgical landmarks, and to derive skill-related motion metrics. Methods: The locations of the pupil, limbus, and 8 classes of surgical instruments were identified by a 2-step algorithm: (1) mask segmentation and (2) landmark identification from the masks. To perform mask segmentation, we trained the YOLACT model on 1156 frames sampled from 268 videos and the public Cataract Dataset for Image Segmentation (CaDIS) dataset. Landmark identification was performed by fitting ellipses or lines to the contours of the masks and deriving locations of interest, including surgical tooltips and the pupil center. Landmark identification was evaluated by the distance between the predicted and true positions in 5853 frames of 10 phacoemulsification video clips. We derived the total path length, maximal speed, and covered area using the tip positions and examined the correlation with human-rated surgical performance. Results: The mean average precision score and intersection-over-union for mask detection were 0.78 and 0.82. The average distance between the predicted and true positions of the pupil center, phaco tip, and second instrument tip was 5.8, 9.1, and 17.1 pixels. The total path length and covered areas of these landmarks were negatively correlated with surgical performance. Conclusions: We developed a deep-learning method to localize key anatomical portions of the eye and cataract surgical tools, which can be used to automatically derive metrics correlated with surgical skill. Translational Relevance: Our system could form the basis of an automated feedback system that helps cataract surgeons evaluate their performance.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionDeep LearningAlgorithmsHumansPupil

Identifiers

PMID36947046
PMCPMC10050900
OpenAlexW4353016381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.