Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946823›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2023

Factors associated with women diagnosed with syphilis who received prenatal care in a primary healthcare unit.

Ana Lúcia de Lima Guedes, Daniela Cristina da Silva Guimarães, Diego Junqueira Sarkis, Tamiris Tiango Gabriel, Camila Silva Delgado, Angélica Atala Lombelo Campos, Mário Círio Nogueira, Luiz Cláudio Ribeiro

Open access · diamondFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of syphilis and associated factors among pregnant women in Brazil: systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Lúcia de Lima GuedesUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0642-6665
Daniela Cristina da Silva GuimarãesUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-0017
Diego Junqueira SarkisUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5618-8650
Tamiris Tiango GabrielUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-5056
Camila Silva DelgadoUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-1662
Angélica Atala Lombelo CamposUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8406-6370
Mário Círio NogueiraUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-4557
Luiz Cláudio RibeiroUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , MG , Brazil .ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8470-7817
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of syphilis and its associated factors in women who were treated at public maternity hospitals and received prenatal care in a primary healthcare unit.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included 399 postpartum women. Interviews were conducted, and additional data were extracted from the pregnant woman's booklet, medical records, and printed tests. The dependent variable was a gestational syphilis diagnosis. The independent variables were grouped into socioeconomic and demographic, behavioral, reproductive, and prenatal blocks. The prevalence, prevalence ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated. The χ 2 test was also performed (p≤0.05). Multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression models.

resultsThe prevalence of gestational syphilis was 9.61% (95%CI: 7.14-12.83). We identified the following determining factors (adjusted prevalence ratios): history of sexually transmitted infections (2.3), first sexual intercourse by the age of 15 (2.42), partner having a history of syphilis (5.98), partner using crack/cocaine (6.42) and marijuana and others (3.02), not having a partner (3.07), low income (2.85), history of stillbirth (5.21), beginning prenatal care in the third trimester (3.15), and prenatal care received in a primary healthcare unit (without a Family Health Strategy team) (0.35).

conclusionIndividual and prenatal factors were associated with gestational syphilis. To control congenital syphilis, targeted interventions are needed to control syphilis in the adult population including expansion of access to quality prenatal care with identification of risks for syphilis and connection between prevention and treatment actions, implementation of strategies focused on early sexual education, effective establish prenatal care involving both partners, and effective implementation of the National Men's Health Policy (PNAISH - Política Nacional de Atenção Integral à Saúde dos Homens ).

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPrenatal CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID36946823
PMCPMC10010254
OpenAlexW4323644916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read1
measurements read53
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.