Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946685›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2023

Infant negative affectivity and patterns of affect-biased attention.

Danielle A Swales, Julie Markant, Ella-Marie P Hennessey, Deborah H Glueck, Benjamin L Hankin, Elysia Poggi Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Longitudinal Changes in Infant Attention-Related Brain Networks and Fearful Temperament.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle A SwalesDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-3187-9885
Julie MarkantDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Ella-Marie P HennesseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.
Deborah H GlueckDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Benjamin L HankinDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Elysia Poggi DavisDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0001-6345-9271
University of Denver · USTulane University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Reducing Fetal Exposure to Maternal Depression to Improve Infant Risk MechanismsR01MH109662 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF DENVER (COLORADO SEMINARY) · PI DAVIS, ELYSIA POGGI, HANKIN, BENJAMIN L · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Postdoctoral Training in Reproductive Mood DisordersT32MH093315 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN Scott GIRDLER, David R. Rubinow · 2012 to 2026
$2.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109662NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH093315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biased attention toward affective cues often cooccurs with the emergence and maintenance of internalizing disorders. However, few studies have assessed whether affect-biased attention in infancy relates to early indicators of psychopathological risk, such as negative affectivity. The current study evaluates whether negative affectivity relates to affect-biased attention in 6-month-old infants. Affect-biased attention was assessed via a free-viewing eye-tracking task in which infants were presented with a series of face pairs (comprised of a happy, angry, or sad face and a neutral face). Attention was quantified with metrics of both attention orienting and attention holding. Overall, infants showed no differences in attention orienting (i.e., speed of looking) or attention holding (i.e., duration of looking) toward emotional faces in comparison to the neutral face pairs. Negative affectivity, assessed via parent report, did not relate to attention orienting but was associated with biased attention toward positive, happy faces and away from threat-cueing, angry faces in comparison to the neutral faces they were paired with. These findings suggest that negative affectivity is associated with differences in attention holding, but not initial orienting toward emotional faces; biases which have important implications for the trajectory of socioemotional development.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAngerAttentionEmotionsFacial ExpressionHappinessHumansInfantaffect-biased attentionattention holdingattention orientingeye trackinginfancynegative affectivity

Identifiers

PMID36946685
PMCPMC10518220
OpenAlexW4322776062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.