Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946530›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2023

Latent Factors of Language Disturbance and Relationships to Quantitative Speech Features.

Sunny X Tang, Katrin Hänsel, Yan Cong, Amir H Nikzad, Aarush Mehta, Sunghye Cho, Sarah Berretta, Leily Behbehani, Sameer Pradhan, Majnu John and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Disorganisation and depression: a re-examination of how we think and speak when depressed.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Linking spontaneous speech, cognition, and psychopathology across affective and psychotic disorders: A network approach.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sunny X TangInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4001-8120
Katrin HänselDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA.
Yan CongInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Amir H NikzadInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Aarush MehtaInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Sunghye ChoLinguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Sarah BerrettaInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Leily BehbehaniInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Sameer PradhanLinguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Majnu JohnInstitute of Behavioral Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Glen Oaks, USA.
Mark Y LibermanLinguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisQuantitative acoustic and textual measures derived from speech ("speech features") may provide valuable biomarkers for psychiatric disorders, particularly schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). We sought to identify cross-diagnostic latent factors for speech disturbance with relevance for SSD and computational modeling. STUDY

designClinical ratings for speech disturbance were generated across 14 items for a cross-diagnostic sample (N = 334), including SSD (n = 90). Speech features were quantified using an automated pipeline for brief recorded samples of free speech. Factor models for the clinical ratings were generated using exploratory factor analysis, then tested with confirmatory factor analysis in the cross-diagnostic and SSD groups. The relationships between factor scores and computational speech features were examined for 202 of the participants. STUDY

resultsWe found a 3-factor model with a good fit in the cross-diagnostic group and an acceptable fit for the SSD subsample. The model identifies an impaired expressivity factor and 2 interrelated disorganized factors for inefficient and incoherent speech. Incoherent speech was specific to psychosis groups, while inefficient speech and impaired expressivity showed intermediate effects in people with nonpsychotic disorders. Each of the 3 factors had significant and distinct relationships with speech features, which differed for the cross-diagnostic vs SSD groups.

conclusionsWe report a cross-diagnostic 3-factor model for speech disturbance which is supported by good statistical measures, intuitive, applicable to SSD, and relatable to linguistic theories. It provides a valuable framework for understanding speech disturbance and appropriate targets for modeling with quantitative speech features.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansLanguageSpeechalogiadisorganizationgraph analysisnatural language processingpsychosisschizophreniathought disorder

Identifiers

PMID36946530
PMCPMC10031730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.