Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946470›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2023

Occlusive wound closure prevents prolonged wound discharge-A randomised controlled trial in patients undergoing tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur because of metastatic bone disease.

Werner H Hettwer, Chunsen Wu, Peter F Horstmann, Claus L Jensen, Anders Krarup-Hansen, Michael M Petersen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Werner H HettwerMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chunsen WuInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Peter F HorstmannMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Claus L JensenMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders Krarup-HansenDepartment of Oncology, Herlev Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael M PetersenMusculoskeletal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2324-6420
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Ethicon Surgical Care, Livingston, UK IIS 14-209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolonged wound discharge is a common postoperative complication of orthopaedic procedures and a risk factor for implant-related infection. Occlusive wound closure methods have previously been suggested to reduce or even prevent this complication. We performed a randomised controlled trial on 70 patients who underwent surgical treatment for metastatic bone disease involving the proximal femur at our centre between January 2017 and August 2018. At conclusion of the tumour resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction procedure, patients were randomised to either occlusive wound closure (n = 35), using the Dermabond Prineo-22 skin closure system, or routine wound closure with conventional skin staples (n = 35). Skin closure with occlusive wound closure resulted in a lesser degree (P < .0001) and shorter duration of postoperative wound discharge (HR 2.89 [95% CI 1.6-5.05], P < .0018). Compared with staples, surgical wounds were already dry after a mean of 3.5 days [95% CI 3.2-3.9] versus 6.1 days [95% CI 4.8-7.3] (P < .0001). Prolonged wound discharge for 7 days or more was observed in 23% of patients (n = 8) in the Staples-group but was entirely absent in the occlusive wound closure group (P < .003). This study provides strong evidence that occlusive wound closure reduces frequency, degree, and duration of wound discharge in a patient population at particularly high risk for this complication.

Indexed as

Bone DiseasesNeoplasmsFemurHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical Wound InfectionSuturesSuture TechniquesWound Closure Techniquesbone metastaseship joint; endoprosthetic reconstructionocclusive wound closure; prolonged wound discharge

Identifiers

PMID36946470
PMCPMC10410326
OpenAlexW4353021262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.