Observational studyThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2023
Validity of Normative Volumetric Estimates from Open Access Software in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Observational study in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the relationships between motor skills, cognitive status, and area deprivation index in Arizona: a pilot study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is typically assessed through brain MRI. Although proprietary software can provide normative estimates of regional atrophy, such tools can be cost-prohibitive for research settings. Free software for generating normative estimates has recently been released but has yet to be validated in the context of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI).
objectivesDetermine whether normative morphometric estimates generated from open-source software replicate established patterns of neurodegeneration in aMCI, and whether these metrics correlate with episodic memory performance.
designObservational study of brain MRI and cognition in aging and aMCI with two identical study visits occurring approximately 1.2 years apart.
settingParticipants were recruited from the local community and outpatient clinical settings.
participantsAdults ages 60-85 with aMCI (n = 25) and cognitively normal controls (CN; n = 74). A subset returned for follow-up (aMCI n = 11, CN n = 52). MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed brain MRI and two neuropsychological tests of verbal episodic memory. FreeSurfer v6.0 and Normative Morphometry Image Statistics were used to generate normative morphometric estimates for AD-relevant regions (hippocampus, parahippocampus, entorhinal cortex, amygdala) and control regions (cuneus, lingual gyrus, pericalcarine gyrus), adjusting for age, sex, head size, scanner manufacturer, and field strength. We tested for baseline group differences in ROI volumes and memory and assessed their within-group associations. We also evaluated changes in ROI volumes over time and tested whether these changes corresponded to declines in memory.
resultsAt baseline, the aMCI group exhibited poorer memory and smaller volumes in AD-relevant regions than the CN group. There were no group differences in control region volumes. Memory was associated with volumes in AD-relevant regions in the aMCI group only. The aMCI group exhibited greater declines than the CN group in hippocampal volume (17% vs. 8% annual decline) and entorhinal volume (54% vs. 5% annual decline). Decrease in hippocampal volume was marginally associated with decline in memory for the aMCI group.
conclusionsNormative morphometric values generated from freely available software demonstrated expected patterns of group differences in AD-related volumes and associations with memory. Significant effects were localized to AD-relevant brain regions and only occurred in the aMCI group. These findings support the validity of these free tools as reliable and cost-effective alternatives to proprietary software for use in research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.