Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36946262›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2023

Contraceptive decision-making through the lens of social determinants of health among female sex workers: A qualitative descriptive study.

Jessica L Zemlak, Kamila A Alexander, Deborah Wilson, Susan G Sherman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L ZemlakJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4770-5070
Kamila A AlexanderJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Deborah WilsonJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Susan G ShermanDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USMarquette University · US

Funding

Exploring barriers and facilitators to women who use drugs (WWUD) awareness, acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 testing, the CARE study.R01DA041243 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHERMAN, SUSAN G. · 2016 to 2023
$5.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041243NIDA NIH HHS R01DA041243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the study was to examine how female sex worker's motivations, desires, intentions and behaviours towards childbearing and childbearing avoidance inform their contraceptive decision-making. We explored the influence of social determinants of health in the domains of social context (sexual partners and experiences of violence), healthcare access, economic instability on the contraceptive decision-making process.

designWe conducted a qualitative descriptive study informed by Miller's Theory of Childbearing Motivations, Desires and Intentions through the lens of social determinants of health.

methodsParticipants were recruited from a parent study, EMERALD, in July-September, 2020. Data were collected from 22 female sex workers ages 18-49 using semi-structured 45 to 60-min audio-recorded interviews and transcribed verbatim. Theory guided the development of the study's interview guide and thematic analytic strategy.

resultsFive themes emerged related to contraceptive decision-making: Motivations (value of fatherhood), Desires (relationships with love), Intentions and Behaviours (drugs overpower everything, contraceptive strategies and having children means being a protector). Women's contraceptive decision-making often included intentions to use contraception. However, social determinants such relationships with clients and intimate partners, interpersonal violence and challenges accessing traditional health care offering contraceptive services often interfered with these intentions and influenced contraceptive behaviours.

conclusionWomen's contraceptive decision-making process included well-informed desires related to childbearing and contraceptive use. However, social determinants across domains of health interfered with autonomous contraceptive decision-making. More effort is needed to examine the influence of social determinants on the reproductive health of this population. IMPACT: Findings from this study build on existing research that examines social determinants impacting reproductive health among female sex workers. Existing theoretical frameworks may not fully capture the influence constrained reproductive autonomy has on contraceptive decision-making. Future studies examining interpersonal and structural barriers to contraception are warranted. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The parent study, EMERALD, collaborated with community service providers in the study intervention.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsSex WorkersChildContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansSexual BehaviorSocial Determinants of HealthContraceptive Agentsdecision-makinginequalities in healthnursingreproductive healthsexual healthviolence

Identifiers

PMID36946262
PMCPMC10308891
OpenAlexW4353015504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.