Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945831›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2023

Fang Liang, Zijiong Dong, Jianmin Ye, Wei Hu, Ramji Kumar Bhandari, Kangsen Mai, Xuegeng Wang

Full text read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Fish Gene Editing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Epigenetic editing: from concept to clinic.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  4. Epigenetic editing of marine medaka (Zoological research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fang LiangInstitute of Modern Aquaculture Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Healthy and Safe Aquaculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Zijiong DongInstitute of Modern Aquaculture Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Healthy and Safe Aquaculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Jianmin YeInstitute of Modern Aquaculture Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Healthy and Safe Aquaculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Wei HuState Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Ramji Kumar BhandariDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Kangsen MaiInstitute of Modern Aquaculture Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Healthy and Safe Aquaculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Xuegeng WangInstitute of Modern Aquaculture Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Healthy and Safe Aquaculture, College of Life Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR/dCas9-based epigenome editing technique has driven much attention. Fused with a catalytic domain from Dnmt or Tet protein, the CRISPR/dCas9-DnmtCD or -TetCD systems possess the targeted DNA methylation editing ability and have established a series of

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA MethylationAnimalsEpigenomeGene EditingZebrafishCRISPR/dCas9DNA methylation editingDnmt7Tet2Zebrafish

Identifiers

PMID36945831
PMCPMC10038036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.