Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945787›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

The impacts and implications of the community face mask use during the Covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative narrative interview study.

Esmée Hanna, Graham Martin, Anne Campbell, Paris Connolly, Kristine Fearon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The impacts and implications of the community face mask use during the Covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative narrative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esmée HannaLeicester School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-6620
Graham MartinThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
Anne CampbellNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance (NIHR HPRU AMR) in the Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paris ConnollyLeicester School of Allied Health Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
Kristine FearonCentre for Reproduction Research, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA range of nonpharmaceutical public health interventions has been introduced in many countries following the rapid spread of Covid-19 since 2020, including recommendations or mandates for the use of face masks or coverings in the community. While the effectiveness of face masks in reducing Covid-19 transmission has been extensively discussed, scant attention has been paid to the lived experience of those wearing face masks.

methodDrawing on 40 narrative interviews with a purposive sample of people in the United Kingdom, with a particular focus on marginalised and minoritized groups, our paper explores experiences of face mask use during the pandemic.

resultsWe find that face masks have a range of societal, health and safety impacts, and prompted positive and negative emotional responses for users. We map our findings onto Lorenc and Oliver's framework for intervention risks. We suggest that qualitative data offer particular insights into the experiences of public health interventions, allowing the potential downsides and risks of interventions to be more fully considered and informing public health policies that might avoid inadvertent harm, particularly towards marginalised groups. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study primarily involved members of the public in the conduct of the research, namely through participation in interviews (email and telephone). The conception for the study involved extensive discussions on social media with a range of people, and we received input and ideas from presentations we delivered on the preliminary analysis.

Indexed as

COVID-19MasksEmotionsHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchCovid-19face masksintervention acceptabilitypublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36945787
PMCPMC10154787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.