Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945697›Full record

ArticleCouple & family psychology2022

A Pilot Randomized Control Trial of a Dyadic Safety Planning Intervention: Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery (SAFER).

Marianne Goodman, Sarah R Sullivan, Angela Page Spears, Dev Crasta, Emily L Mitchell, Barbara Stanley, Lisa Dixon, Erin A Hazlett, Shirley Glynn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Couple & family psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marianne GoodmanVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Sarah R SullivanVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Angela Page SpearsVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Dev CrastaVISN 2 Center of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, NY.
Emily L MitchellVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Barbara StanleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY USA.
Lisa DixonVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Erin A HazlettVISN 2 Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Shirley GlynnSemel Institute of Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James J. Peters VA Medical Center · USNew York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute · USCanandaigua VA Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

SAFER: A brief intervention involving family members in suicide safety planningI01RX002432 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GOODMAN, MARIANNE · 2017 to 2019
–
RRD VA I01 RX002432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent systematic review on family and suicide prevention efforts identified a lack of family-based safety planning interventions for adults. To address this gap, The Safe Actions for Families to Encourage Recovery (SAFER) intervention was created. SAFER is a novel, manualized, 4- session, family-based treatment intervention that provides the tools and structure to support family involvement in Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) for Veterans at moderate risk for suicide. The SAFER intervention includes the use of psychoeducation, communication skills training, and development of a Veteran, and a complementary supporting partner, SPI. This Stage II (2aii) randomized clinical trial (RCT) evaluated the preliminary efficacy of this innovative and much-needed approach. Thirty-nine Veterans and an associated supporting partner were randomized to receive either SAFER or currently mandated (i.e., standard) individual Safety Planning Intervention (I-SPI). Veterans in the SAFER condition as compared to I-SPI exhibited significant monthly decrements in suicide ideation as measured by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (B=-0.37; p=.032). Moreover, a treatment-by-time interaction emerged when predicting improvements in Veteran suicide-related coping (B=0.08; p=.028) and supporting partner support of Veteran's coping efforts (B=0.17; p=.032). However, the treatment effect for Veteran coping was not significant in dyadic analyses (B=0.07; p=.151) after controlling for the partner's support (B=0.16; p=.009). Self-reported appraisals of relational factors and self-efficacy were not impacted by condition for either Veterans or supporting partners. This initial efficacy pilot trial suggests that a brief dyad-based SPI has the potential to improve Veteran suicide symptoms and help family members support the Veteran's coping efforts. However more intensive family work may be required for changes in self-perceptions of burdensomeness, belongingness, and caregiver perceptions of the Veteran as a burden. Nonetheless, SAFER's discussion and disclosure about suicide symptoms facilitated more robust development of SPI for the Veteran and their accompanying supporting partner.

Indexed as

Dyadic treatmentFamily involvementManualized treatmentmilitaryPsychoeducationSafety-planning interventionSkills-trainingsuicide preventionSuicide riskVeterans

Identifiers

PMID36945697
PMCPMC10026708
OpenAlexW4200102551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.