ArticleJournal of clinical virology plus2022
Improvements in metagenomic virus detection by simple pretreatment methods.
Article in Journal of clinical virology plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of an Automated, End-to-End Metagenomic Sequencing Assay for Agnostic Detection of Respiratory Viruses.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Unbiased Virus Detection in a Danish Zoo Using a Portable Metagenomic Sequencing System.Viruses · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early detection of pathogens at the point of care helps reduce the threats to human and animal health from emerging pathogens. Initially, the disease-causing agent will be unknown and needs to be identified; this often requires specific laboratory facilities. Here we describe the development of an unbiased detection assay for RNA and DNA viruses using metagenomic Nanopore sequencing and simple methods that can be transferred into a field setting. Human clinical samples containing the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2 or the DNA viruses human papillomavirus (HPV) and molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV) were used as a test of concept. Firstly, the virus detection potential was optimized by investigating different pretreatments for reducing non-viral nucleic acid components. DNase I pretreatment followed by filtration increased the proportion of SARS-CoV-2 sequenced reads > 500-fold compared with no pretreatments. This was sufficient to achieve virus detection with high confidence and allowed variant identification. Next, we tested individual SARS-CoV-2 samples with various viral loads (measured as CT-values determined by RT-qPCR). Lastly, we tested the assay on clinical samples containing the DNA virus HPV and co-infection with MCV to show the assay's detection potential for DNA viruses. This protocol is fast (same day results). We hope to apply this method in other settings for point of care detection of virus pathogens, thus eliminating the need for transport of infectious samples, cold storage and a specialized laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.