Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945565›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

Computer Vision Analysis of Specimen Mammography to Predict Margin Status.

Kevin A Chen, Kathryn E Kirchoff, Logan R Butler, Alexa D Holloway, Muneera R Kapadia, Kristalyn K Gallagher, Shawn M Gomez

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin A ChenDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kathryn E KirchoffJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Logan R ButlerDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Alexa D HollowayDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Muneera R KapadiaDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kristalyn K GallagherDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Shawn M GomezJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

Funding

UNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-operative specimen mammography is a valuable tool in breast cancer surgery, providing immediate assessment of margins for a resected tumor. However, the accuracy of specimen mammography in detecting microscopic margin positivity is low. We sought to develop a deep learning-based model to predict the pathologic margin status of resected breast tumors using specimen mammography. A dataset of specimen mammography images matched with pathology reports describing margin status was collected. Models pre-trained on radiologic images were developed and compared with models pre-trained on non-medical images. Model performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The dataset included 821 images and 53% had positive margins. For three out of four model architectures tested, models pre-trained on radiologic images outperformed domain-agnostic models. The highest performing model, InceptionV3, showed a sensitivity of 84%, a specificity of 42%, and AUROC of 0.71. These results compare favorably with the published literature on surgeon and radiologist interpretation of specimen mammography. With further development, these models could assist clinicians with identifying positive margins intra-operatively and decrease the rate of positive margins and re-operation in breast-conserving surgery.

Identifiers

PMID36945565
PMCPMC10029028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.