Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945543›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Matrix and analysis metadata standards (MAMS) to facilitate harmonization and reproducibility of single-cell data.

Yichen Wang, Irzam Sarfraz, Wei Kheng Teh, Artem Sokolov, Brian R Herb, Heather H Creasy, Isaac Virshup, Ruben Dries, Kylee Degatano, Anup Mahurkar and 6 more

Open access · greenFull text readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Yichen WangDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Irzam SarfrazDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Wei Kheng TehEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Artem SokolovLaboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian R HerbInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Heather H CreasyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Isaac VirshupDepartment of Computational Health, Helmholtz Munich, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Ruben DriesDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Kylee DegatanoData Sciences Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anup MahurkarInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel J SchnellBiomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Pedro MadrigalEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Jason HiltonDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nils GehlenborgBiomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Timothy TickleData Sciences Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joshua D CampbellDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Boston University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USBroad Institute · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBHarvard University · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology · DEStanford University · US

Funding

The LungMAP Data Coordination Center for Next Gen Systems Biology of RespirationU24HL148865 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Bruce J Aronow, Nathan G. Salomonis · 2019 to 2026
$12.4M
The Lung PCA: A Multi-Dimensional Atlas of Pulmonary PremalignancyU2CCA233238 · NCI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI SPIRA, AVRUM E · 2018 to 2021
$7.0M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233238NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL148865Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of genomic and imaging datasets are being produced by consortia that seek to characterize healthy and disease tissues at single-cell resolution. While much effort has been devoted to capturing information related to biospecimen information and experimental procedures, the metadata standards that describe data matrices and the analysis workflows that produced them are relatively lacking. Detailed metadata schema related to data analysis are needed to facilitate sharing and interoperability across groups and to promote data provenance for reproducibility. To address this need, we developed the Matrix and Analysis Metadata Standards (MAMS) to serve as a resource for data coordinating centers and tool developers. We first curated several simple and complex "use cases" to characterize the types of feature-observation matrices (FOMs), annotations, and analysis metadata produced in different workflows. Based on these use cases, metadata fields were defined to describe the data contained within each matrix including those related to processing, modality, and subsets. Suggested terms were created for the majority of fields to aid in harmonization of metadata terms across groups. Additional provenance metadata fields were also defined to describe the software and workflows that produced each FOM. Finally, we developed a simple list-like schema that can be used to store MAMS information and implemented in multiple formats. Overall, MAMS can be used as a guide to harmonize analysis-related metadata which will ultimately facilitate integration of datasets across tools and consortia. MAMS specifications, use cases, and examples can be found at https://github.com/single-cell-mams/mams/.

Identifiers

PMID36945543
PMCPMC10028847
OpenAlexW4323349965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.