ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Sensitive cluster-free differential expression testing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- On feature selection to disentangle cell type and state transcriptional programs.BMC genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Comparing molecular features, including the identification of genes with differential expression (DE) between conditions, is a powerful approach for characterising disease-specific phenotypes. When testing for DE in single-cell RNA sequencing data, current pipelines first assign cells into discrete clusters (or cell types), followed by testing for differences within each cluster. Consequently, the sensitivity and specificity of DE testing are limited and ultimately dictated by the granularity of the cell type annotation, with discrete clustering being especially suboptimal for continuous trajectories. To overcome these limitations, we present miloDE - a cluster-free framework for differential expression testing. We build on the Milo approach, introduced for differential cell abundance testing, which leverages the graph representation of single-cell data to assign relatively homogenous, 'neighbouring' cells into overlapping neighbourhoods. We address key differences between differential abundance and expression testing at the level of neighbourhood assignment, statistical testing, and multiple testing correction. To illustrate the performance of miloDE we use both simulations and real data, in the latter case identifying a transient haemogenic endothelia-like state in chimeric mouse embryos lacking Tal1 as well as uncovering distinct transcriptional programs that characterise changes in macrophages in patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. miloDE is available as an open-source R package at https://github.com/MarioniLab/miloDE.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.