ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Natural language processing models reveal neural dynamics of human conversation.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Through conversation, humans relay complex information through the alternation of speech production and comprehension. The neural mechanisms that underlie these complementary processes or through which information is precisely conveyed by language, however, remain poorly understood. Here, we used pretrained deep learning natural language processing models in combination with intracranial neuronal recordings to discover neural signals that reliably reflect speech production, comprehension, and their transitions during natural conversation between individuals. Our findings indicate that neural activities that encoded linguistic information were broadly distributed throughout frontotemporal areas across multiple frequency bands. We also find that these activities were specific to the words and sentences being conveyed and that they were dependent on the word's specific context and order. Finally, we demonstrate that these neural patterns partially overlapped during language production and comprehension and that listener-speaker transitions were associated with specific, time-aligned changes in neural activity. Collectively, our findings reveal a dynamical organization of neural activities that subserve language production and comprehension during natural conversation and harness the use of deep learning models in understanding the neural mechanisms underlying human language.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.