ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023
Archetypal analysis of COVID-19 in Montana, USA, March 13, 2020 to April 26, 2022.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the potential consequences of infectious diseases, it is important to understand how broad scale incidence variability influences the probability of localized outbreaks. Often, these infectious disease data can involve complex spatial patterns intermixed with temporal trends. Archetypal Analysis is a method to mine complex spatiotemporal epidemiological data, and can be used to discover the dynamics of spatial patterns. The application of Archetypal Analysis to epistemological data is relatively new, and here we present one of the first applications using COVID-19 data from March 13, 2020 to April 26, 2022, in the counties of Montana, USA. We present three views of the data set with Archetypal Analysis. First, we evaluate the entire 56 county data set. Second, we compute mutual information of the 56 counties' time series to remove counties whose dynamics are mainly independent from most of the other counties. We choose the top 17 counties ranked in terms of increasing total mutual information. Finally, to compare how population size might influence results, we conducted an analysis with 10 of the largest counties. Using the Archetypal Analysis results, we analyze the disease outbreaks across Montana, comparing and contrasting the three different cases and showing how certain counties can be found in distinct sets of archetypes. Using the reconstruction time series, we show how each outbreak had a unique trajectory across the state in terms of the archetypes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.