ArticleResearch square2023
Noninvasive electrophysiological imaging identifies 4D uterine peristalsis patterns in subjects with normal menstrual cycles and patients with endometriosis.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout the menstrual cycle, spontaneous mild contractions in the inner layer of the uterine smooth muscle cause uterine peristalsis, which plays a critical role in normal menstruation and fertility. Disruptions in peristalsis patterns may occur in women experiencing subfertility, abnormal uterine bleeding, ovulatory dysfunction, endometriosis, and other disorders. However, current tools to measure uterine peristalsis in humans have limitations that hamper their research or clinical utilities. Here, we describe an electrophysiological imaging system to noninvasively quantify the four-dimensional (4D) electrical activation pattern during human uterine peristalsis with high spatial and temporal resolution and coverage. We longitudinally imaged 4968 uterine peristalses in 17 participants with normal gynecologic anatomy and physiology over 34 hours and 679 peristalses in 5 participants with endometriosis over 12.5 hours throughout the menstrual cycle. Our data provide quantitative evidence that uterine peristalsis changes in frequency, direction, duration, magnitude, and power throughout the menstrual cycle and is disrupted in endometriosis patients. Moreover, our data suggest that disrupted uterine peristalsis contributes to excess retrograde menstruation and infertility in patients with endometriosis and potentially contributes to infertility in this cohort.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.