Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945355›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Comparative study of convolutional neural network architectures for gastrointestinal lesions classification.

Erik O Cuevas-Rodriguez, Carlos E Galvan-Tejada, Valeria Maeda-Gutiérrez, Gamaliel Moreno-Chávez, Jorge I Galván-Tejada, Hamurabi Gamboa-Rosales, Huizilopoztli Luna-García, Arturo Moreno-Baez, José María Celaya-Padilla

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erik O Cuevas-RodriguezUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
Carlos E Galvan-TejadaUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.ORCID 0000-0002-7635-4687
Valeria Maeda-GutiérrezUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
Gamaliel Moreno-ChávezUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
Jorge I Galván-TejadaUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
Hamurabi Gamboa-RosalesUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.ORCID 0000-0002-9498-6602
Huizilopoztli Luna-GarcíaUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
Arturo Moreno-BaezUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.
José María Celaya-PadillaUnidad Académica de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract can be affected by different diseases or lesions such as esophagitis, ulcers, hemorrhoids, and polyps, among others. Some of them can be precursors of cancer such as polyps. Endoscopy is the standard procedure for the detection of these lesions. The main drawback of this procedure is that the diagnosis depends on the expertise of the doctor. This means that some important findings may be missed. In recent years, this problem has been addressed by deep learning (DL) techniques. Endoscopic studies use digital images. The most widely used DL technique for image processing is the convolutional neural network (CNN) due to its high accuracy for modeling complex phenomena. There are different CNNs that are characterized by their architecture. In this article, four architectures are compared: AlexNet, DenseNet-201, Inception-v3, and ResNet-101. To determine which architecture best classifies GI tract lesions, a set of metrics; accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) were used. These architectures were trained and tested on the HyperKvasir dataset. From this dataset, a total of 6,792 images corresponding to 10 findings were used. A transfer learning approach and a data augmentation technique were applied. The best performing architecture was DenseNet-201, whose results were: 97.11% of accuracy, 96.3% sensitivity, 99.67% specificity, and 95% AUC.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal TractNeural Networks, ComputerClassificationComputer-aided diagnosticConvolutional neural networkDeep learningEndoscopyGastrointestinalGastrointestinal lesions

Identifiers

PMID36945355
PMCPMC10024900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read54
reference markers read14
identifiers read15
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.