Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945327›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2022

Testing Mediation Effects Using Logic of Boolean Matrices.

Chengchun Shi, Lexin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Causal mediation analysis: selection with asymptotically valid inference.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adaptive bootstrap tests for composite null hypotheses in the mediation pathway analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2024
    Article
  5. Discovery and inference of a causal network with hidden confounding.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. On optimal two-stage testing of multiple mediators.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chengchun ShiLondon School of Economics and Political Science and University of California at Berkeley.
Lexin LiLondon School of Economics and Political Science and University of California at Berkeley.

Funding

Neural and Biochemical Mechanisms of Cognitive AgingR01AG034570 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI William J. Jagust · 2009 to 2026
$12.0M
Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease Progression in the Aging BrainR01AG062542 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI JAGUST, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$4.2M
New Statistical Methods for Multicenter Multimodal Longitudinal Neuroimaging AnalysisR01AG061303 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LI, LEXIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034570NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061303NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central question in high-dimensional mediation analysis is to infer the significance of individual mediators. The main challenge is that the total number of potential paths that go through any mediator is super-exponential in the number of mediators. Most existing mediation inference solutions either explicitly impose that the mediators are conditionally independent given the exposure, or ignore any potential directed paths among the mediators. In this article, we propose a novel hypothesis testing procedure to evaluate individual mediation effects, while taking into account potential interactions among the mediators. Our proposal thus fills a crucial gap, and greatly extends the scope of existing mediation tests. Our key idea is to construct the test statistic using the logic of Boolean matrices, which enables us to establish the proper limiting distribution under the null hypothesis. We further employ screening, data splitting, and decorrelated estimation to reduce the bias and increase the power of the test. We show that our test can control both the size and false discovery rate asymptotically, and the power of the test approaches one, while allowing the number of mediators to diverge to infinity with the sample size. We demonstrate the efficacy of the method through simulations and a neuroimaging study of Alzheimer's disease. A Python implementation of the proposed procedure is available at https://github.com/callmespring/LOGAN.

Indexed as

Boolean matrixDirected acyclic graphGaussian graphical modelHigh-dimensional inferenceMediation analysisNeuroimaging analysis

Identifiers

PMID36945327
PMCPMC10027382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.