Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945299›Full record

ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2023

No evidence that spice consumption is a cancer prevention mechanism in human populations.

Antoine M Dujon, Aurélie Tasiemski, Pascal Pujol, Anthony Turpin, Beata Ujvari, Frédéric Thomas

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine M DujonCentre for Integrative Ecology, Geelong, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-9156
Aurélie TasiemskiUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 9017 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France.
Pascal PujolCANECEV-Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer (CREEC), Montpellier 34090, France.
Anthony TurpinInstitut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9020-UMR-S 1277-Canther-Cancer Heterogeneity, Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Beata UjvariCentre for Integrative Ecology, Geelong, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216, Australia.
Frédéric ThomasCANECEV-Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer (CREEC), Montpellier 34090, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDeakin University · AUHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Why humans historically began to incorporate spices into their diets is still a matter of unresolved debate. For example, a recent study (Bromham et al. There is little evidence that spicy food in hot countries is an adaptation to reducing infection risk. Methods: Because several spices are known to have anticancer effects, we explored the hypothesis that natural selection and/or cultural evolution may have favoured spice consumption as an adaptive prophylactic response to reduce the burden of cancer pathology. We used linear models to investigate the potential relationship between age-standardized gastrointestinal cancer rates and spice consumption in 36 countries. Results: Patterns of spice are not consistent with a cancer mitigation mechanism: the age-standardized rate of almost all gastrointestinal cancers was not related to spice consumption. Conclusions: Direction other than foodborne pathogens and cancers should be explored to understand the health reasons, if any, why our ancestors developed a taste for spices.

Indexed as

behaviouroncogenesprophylaxy

Identifiers

PMID36945299
PMCPMC10024787
OpenAlexW4309845487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read3
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.