ArticleCureus2023
Analysis of Emergency Department Visits by Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A National Population-Based Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Set up and the Triggers: An Update on the Risk Factors for Giant Cell Arteritis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Analysis of Emergency Department Visits by Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis: A National Population-Based Study.Cureus · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background There is scarcity of national level data on the reasons for Emergency Department (ED) presentation among patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) in the United States. This study aims to outline the most common reasons for ED presentation among these patients, and the baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits principally for GCA. Materials and methods We obtained data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) 2018 database. Each ED visit in the NEDS has a principal diagnosis (the main reason for the visit) and can have up to 34 other secondary diagnoses. We searched for ED visits for patients aged ≥50 with any diagnosis of GCA using ICD-10 codes. The most common principal discharge diagnoses were divided into organ systems, and specific principal discharge diagnoses were recorded for ED visits among patients with GCA in descending order of frequency. We then outlined baseline characteristics and outcomes of ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. Results There were 20,886 ED visits for patients with GCA in 2018. Infections, as well as rheumatologic and cardiovascular disease were the most common reasons for ED presentation, and GCA was the most common specific principal discharge diagnosis for ED visits. There were 3888 ED visits with a principal diagnosis of GCA. These patients were predominantly elderly females, admitted, Medicare insured, with minimal comorbidity burden, and presented to metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south. Conclusion GCA patients are most likely to present to the ED due to their underlying GCA. Infections and CV are also common reasons for presentation to the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.