Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945210›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of clinical oncology2021

Tumor grade 2 as the independent predictor for lymph node metastasis in 10-20 mm sized rectal neuroendocrine tumor.

Byung-Soo Park, Sung Hwan Cho, Gyung Mo Son, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Jin Kim, Su Bum Park, Cheol Woong Choi, Hyung Wook Kim, Dong Hoon Shin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Byung-Soo ParkDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7782-5551
Sung Hwan ChoDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0451-5987
Gyung Mo SonDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-6293
Hyun Sung KimDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-4597
Su Jin KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3816-9664
Su Bum ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1573-2792
Cheol Woong ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-3039
Hyung Wook KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2444-0591
Dong Hoon ShinDepartment of Pathology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4980-9295
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) <10 mm are endoscopically resected, while those ≥20 mm are treated with radical surgical resection. The choice of treatment for 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs remains controversial. This study aimed to verify factors predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) of 10-20 mm sized rectal NET and utilize them to decide upon the treatment strategy. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs treated at Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital from January 2009 to September 2020 were divided into LNM (+) and LNM (-) groups, and their respective data were analyzed. Results: Seven patients (25%) had LNM while 21 patients (75%) did not. Endorectal ultrasound findings showed tumor size was significantly larger in the LNM (+) than in the LNM (-) group (15 mm vs. 10 mm, P=0.018); however, pathologically, there was no significant difference in tumor size (13 mm vs. 11 mm, P=0.109). The mitotic count (P=0.011), Ki-67 index (P=0.008), and proportion of tumor grade 2 patients (5 cases, 71% vs. 1 case, 5%; P=0.001) were significantly higher in the LNM (+) group. In multivariate analysis, tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM (odds ratio, 61.32; 95% confidence interval, 3.17-1,188.64; P=0.010). Conclusion: Tumor grade 2 was the independent factor predicting LNM in 10-20 mm sized rectal NETs. Therefore, it could be considered as the meaningful factor in determining whether radical resection is necessary.

Indexed as

EndoscopyGradeLymphatic metastasisNeuroendocrine tumorsRectum

Identifiers

PMID36945210
PMCPMC9942737
OpenAlexW3183812204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.