SynthesisSystematic reviews2023
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pregabalin and duloxetine combination for painful diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- [Practical guideline on the prevention and management of diabetic foot in China (Ⅰ)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Guideline
- Systematic review of translational insights: Neuromodulation in animal models for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Immunological mechanisms and therapeutic advances in diabetic neuropathy.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: New Diagnostics and Treatment Perspectives.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Comparative study evaluating the efficacy of duloxetine, gabapentin, and lacosamide on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.Pain reports · 2025Article
- High-concentration (8%) capsaicin patch for chronic postoperative neuropathic pain: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.British journal of pain · 2025Article
- Delving into the Perception, Use, and Context of Duloxetine in Clinical Practice: An Analysis Based on the Experience of Healthcare Professionals.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Duloxetine in the Management of Diabetic Neuropathy: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Practical guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease in China.Burns & trauma · 2025Article
- Review of nonpharmacological interventions for delaying the effects of cerebral neuropathy caused by diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- A Review of Recent Pharmacological Advances in the Management of Diabetes-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPainful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a key concern in clinical practice. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared duloxetine and placebo treatments in terms of their efficacy and safety in patients with PDPN.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for relevant English articles published before January 11, 2021. Treatment efficacy and safety were assessed in terms of pain improvement, patient-reported health-related performance, and patients' quality of life.
resultsWe reviewed a total of 7 randomized controlled trials. Regarding pain improvement, duloxetine was more efficacious than placebo (mean difference [MD] - 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.09 to - 0.69; P < .00001). Furthermore, duloxetine significantly improved the patients' quality of life, which was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression severity subscale (MD - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.36; P < .00001), Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.37; P < .00001), and European Quality of Life Instrument 5D version (MD 0.04; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.07; P = .0002). Severe adverse events were rare, whereas nausea, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, and decreased appetite were common; approximately, 12.6% of all patients dropped out because of the common symptoms.
conclusionsDuloxetine is more efficacious than placebo treatments in patients with PDPN. The rarity of severe adverse events indicates that duloxetine is safe. When a 60-mg dose is insufficient, 120 mg of duloxetine may improve PDPN symptoms. Our findings may help devise optimal treatment strategies for PDPN. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021225451.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.