Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945033›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2023

Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chung-Sheng Wu, Yu-Jui Huang, Yuan-Chun Ko, Che-Hsiung Lee

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chung-Sheng Wu *Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yu-Jui Huang *Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yuan-Chun KoDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Che-Hsiung LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Trauma Plastic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fuxing St, Gueishan District 333, Linkou, Taiwan. ikemanleee@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6164-4884
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPainful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a key concern in clinical practice. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared duloxetine and placebo treatments in terms of their efficacy and safety in patients with PDPN.

methodsFollowing the PRISMA guidelines, we searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases for relevant English articles published before January 11, 2021. Treatment efficacy and safety were assessed in terms of pain improvement, patient-reported health-related performance, and patients' quality of life.

resultsWe reviewed a total of 7 randomized controlled trials. Regarding pain improvement, duloxetine was more efficacious than placebo (mean difference [MD] - 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.09 to - 0.69; P < .00001). Furthermore, duloxetine significantly improved the patients' quality of life, which was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression severity subscale (MD - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.61 to - 0.36; P < .00001), Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (MD - 0.50; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.37; P < .00001), and European Quality of Life Instrument 5D version (MD 0.04; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.07; P = .0002). Severe adverse events were rare, whereas nausea, somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, constipation, and decreased appetite were common; approximately, 12.6% of all patients dropped out because of the common symptoms.

conclusionsDuloxetine is more efficacious than placebo treatments in patients with PDPN. The rarity of severe adverse events indicates that duloxetine is safe. When a 60-mg dose is insufficient, 120 mg of duloxetine may improve PDPN symptoms. Our findings may help devise optimal treatment strategies for PDPN. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021225451.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic NeuropathiesDuloxetine HydrochlorideHumansPainQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDuloxetine HydrochlorideDuloxetineMeta-analysisPainful diabetic polyneuropathySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36945033
PMCPMC10031998
OpenAlexW4328132739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read6
measurements read142
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.