Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36945001›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

The role of SPECT/CT in painful, noninfected knees after knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis-a diagnostic test accuracy review.

Luz Kelly Anzola, Nathaly Hernandez, Luis Fernando Rodriguez, Gilberto Sanguino, Ernesto Martinez, Rodrigo Lopez, Sergio Moreno, Robert Prill, Fernando Mut, Helmut Rasch and 1 more

Open access · goldFull text readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Technological Advances in SPECT and SPECT/CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luz Kelly AnzolaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia. Lkanzola@gmail.com.
Nathaly HernandezFundacion Universitaria Sanitas Nuclear Medicine Postgraduate Program, Bogota, Colombia.
Luis Fernando RodriguezDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia.
Gilberto SanguinoDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia.
Ernesto MartinezDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia.
Rodrigo LopezDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Clinica Reina Sofia, Bogota, Colombia.
Sergio MorenoClinical Epidemiologist, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia.
Robert PrillCenter of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodore Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany.
Fernando MutDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Helmut RaschInstitute for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Michael HirschmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4101, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
Kantonsspital Baselland Standort Bruderholz · CHFundación Universitaria Sanitas · COHospital Italiano de Montevideo · UYUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this systematic review was to present the current evidence on the clinical use of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in the evaluation of noninfected painful knees after knee arthroplasty.

methodsEmbase, PubMed, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, Science Direct and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from database inception to May 2022 following the PRISMA guidelines. As a primary outcome, we defined the role of SPECT/CT in the diagnostic approach to noninfected painful knee arthroplasty; as a secondary objective, we described the noninfection-related factors linked to painful knee arthroplasty. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio values and other indicators were calculated; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis results and a summary of the areas under the curve (AUCs) from the included studies were reported. A Fagan plot, likelihood ratio plot and Deeks' funnel plot were generated and analysed. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach.

resultsA total of 493 publications were identified, of which eight met the inclusion criteria, with a final pooled sample size of 308 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT/CT in diagnosing the source of pain in painful knee prostheses were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75-0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.79-0.96), respectively, with pooled +LR and -LR values of 8.9 (95% CI: 4.11-19.19) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.28). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 57.35, and the area under the curve was 0.94. SPECT/CT highly accurately identified different sources of pain, such as loosening of the prosthetic components, patellofemoral overloading, instability, malalignment of the components and degeneration of the patellofemoral compartment. The confidence of the estimates was moderate according to the GRADE approach.

conclusionWith demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, as a diagnostic tool, SPECT/CT can identify the source of pain in painful knees after knee arthroplasty, particularly in cases of loosening, patellofemoral disorders and component malalignment (level of evidence III). These findings have significant clinical repercussions, such as in changing the initial diagnosis, identifying or excluding different causes of painful knee arthroplasties, guiding subsequent treatment and positively impacting the final clinical outcome. We moderately recommend the use of SPECT/CT for identifying the source of pain after knee arthroplasty according to the GRADE assessment. This review was preregistered in Prospero under code CRD42022320457.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansKnee JointPainSensitivity and SpecificitySingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed Tomography

Identifiers

PMID36945001
PMCPMC10031962
OpenAlexW4353017572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read64
table measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.