Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944885›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Multi-omics Data Integration in the Context of Plant Abiotic Stress Signaling.

Harold Duruflé, Sébastien Déjean

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harold DurufléINRAE, ONF, BioForA, UMR 0588, Orléans, France. harold.durufle@inrae.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-2822
Sébastien DéjeanInstitut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, UMR 5219, Toulouse, France. sebastien.dejean@math.univ-toulouse.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9610-5306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to answer new biological questions, high-throughput data generated by new biotechnologies can be very meaningful but require specific and adapted statistical treatments. Thus, in the context of abiotic stress signaling studies, understanding the integration of cascading mechanisms from stress perception to biochemical and physiological adjustments necessarily entails efficient and valid analysis of multilevel and heterogeneous data. In this chapter, we propose examples to manage, analyze, and integrate multi-omics heterogeneous data. This workflow suggests and follows different general biological questions or issues answered with detailed code, data analysis, multiple visualizations, and always followed by brief interpretations. We illustrated this using the mixOmics package for the R software, as it specifically provides tools to address vertical and horizontal data integration issues. In order to illustrate this workflow, we used the usual omics datasets biologists can generate (phenomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics). These data were collected from two organs (leaf rosettes, floral stems) of five ecotypes of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to two temperature growth conditions. They are available in the R package WallOmicsData. The workflow presented here is not limited to Arabidopsis thaliana and can be applied to any plant species. It can even be largely deployed to whatever the organisms of interest and the biological questions may be.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisMultiomicsMetabolomicsProteomicsSoftwareArabidopsis thalianaCell wall proteinsEcotypeFloral stemIntegrative analysisLeaf rosetteOmics dataSignaling biomarkersStatisticsSystems biologyTemperature

Identifiers

PMID36944885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.