Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944832›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2023

Real-time deep neural network-based automatic bowel gas segmentation on X-ray images for particle beam treatment.

Toshio Kumakiri, Shinichiro Mori, Yasukuni Mori, Ryusuke Hirai, Ayato Hashimoto, Yasuhiko Tachibana, Hiroki Suyari, Hitoshi Ishikawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Toshio KumakiriInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage- ku, 263-8555, Chiba, Japan.
Shinichiro MoriInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage- ku, 263-8555, Chiba, Japan. mori.shinichiro@qst.go.jp.
Yasukuni MoriGraduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Inage-ku, 263-8522, Chiba, Japan.
Ryusuke HiraiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, Inage-ku, 263-8522, Chiba, Japan.
Ayato HashimotoInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage- ku, 263-8555, Chiba, Japan.
Yasuhiko TachibanaInstitute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage- ku, 263-8555, Chiba, Japan.
Hiroki SuyariGraduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Inage-ku, 263-8522, Chiba, Japan.
Hitoshi IshikawaQST hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Inage-ku, 263-8555, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since particle beam distribution is vulnerable to change in bowel gas because of its low density, we developed a deep neural network (DNN) for bowel gas segmentation on X-ray images. We used 6688 image datasets from 209 cases as training data, 736 image datasets from 23 cases as validation data and 102 image datasets from 51 cases as test data (total 283 cases). For the training data, we prepared three types of digitally reconstructed radiographic (DRR) images (all-density, bone and gas) by projecting the treatment planning CT image data. However, the real X-ray images acquired in the treatment room showed low contrast that interfered with manual delineation of bowel gas. Therefore, we used synthetic X-ray images converted from DRR images in addition to real X-ray images.We evaluated DNN segmentation accuracy for the synthetic X-ray images using Intersection over Union, recall, precision, and the Dice coefficient, which measured 0.708 ± 0.208, 0.832 ± 0.170, 0.799 ± 0.191, and 0.807 ± 0.178, respectively. The evaluation metrics for the real X-images were less accurate than those for the synthetic X-ray images (0.408 ± 0237, 0.685 ± 0.326, 0.490 ± 0272, and 0.534 ± 0.271, respectively). Computation time was 29.7 ± 1.3 ms/image. Our DNN appears useful in increasing treatment accuracy in particle beam therapy.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedNeural Networks, ComputerX-RaysBowel gasDeep neural networkImage segmentationParticle beam therapyPatient setup

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.