Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944641›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2023

Does anxiety explain why math-anxious people underperform in math?

Richard J Daker, Sylvia U Gattas, Elizabeth A Necka, Adam E Green, Ian M Lyons

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Math anxiety and arithmetic learning: Evidence for impaired procedural learning and enhanced retrieval learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard J DakerDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA. rjd107@georgetown.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-4791
Sylvia U GattasDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elizabeth A NeckaNational Institutes on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-5710
Adam E GreenDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.
Ian M LyonsDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER-2041887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Math-anxious people consistently underperform in math. The most widely accepted explanation for why this underperformance occurs is that math-anxious people experience heightened anxiety when faced with math, and this in-the-moment anxiety interferes with performance. Surprisingly, this explanation has not been tested directly. Here, using both self-report and physiological indices of anxiety, we directly test how much in-the-moment anxiety explains math-anxious underperformance. Results indicate that in-the-moment anxiety indeed explains why math-anxious people underperform-but only partially, suggesting a need to seriously consider alternative mechanisms. Results also showed that while some highly math-anxious individuals-those with high levels of heart rate variability-experienced less in-the-moment anxiety, they nevertheless performed no better at math. For these individuals, math-anxious underperformance must occur for reasons unrelated to in-the-moment anxiety. More broadly, our findings point to substantial individual heterogeneity in the mechanisms underlying math-anxious underperformance. Accounting for this mechanistic heterogeneity may prove vital for optimally boosting math performance in math-anxious individuals.

Identifiers

PMID36944641
PMCPMC10030629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read22
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.