Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944488›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Decoding of Working Memory Contents in Auditory Cortex Is Not Distractor-Resistant.

Philipp Deutsch, Stefan Czoschke, Cora Fischer, Jochen Kaiser, Christoph Bledowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maintaining Auditory Working Memory Representations beyond Sensory Cortices Makes Working Memory Work.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philipp DeutschInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.
Stefan CzoschkeInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7863-8272
Cora FischerInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5668-9439
Jochen KaiserInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6740-5000
Christoph BledowskiInstitute of Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main 60528, Germany bledowski@em.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-7683
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory enables the temporary storage of relevant information in the service of behavior. Neuroimaging studies have suggested that sensory cortex is involved in maintaining contents in working memory. This raised the question of how sensory regions maintain memory representations during the exposure to distracting stimuli. Multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI signals in visual cortex has shown that the contents of visual working memory could be decoded concurrently with passively viewed distractors. The present fMRI study tested whether this finding extends to auditory working memory and to active distractor processing. We asked participants to memorize the pitch of a target sound and to compare it with a probe sound presented after a 13 s delay period. In separate conditions, we compared a blank delay phase (no distraction) with either passive listening to, or active processing of, an auditory distractor presented throughout the memory delay. Consistent with previous reports, pitch-specific memory information could be decoded in auditory cortex during the delay in trials without distraction. In contrast, decoding of target sounds in early auditory cortex dropped to chance level during both passive and active distraction. This was paralleled by memory performance decrements under distraction. Extending the analyses beyond sensory cortex yielded some evidence for memory content-specific activity in inferior frontal and superior parietal cortex during active distraction. In summary, while our findings question the involvement of early auditory cortex in the maintenance of distractor-resistant working memory contents, further research should elucidate the role of hierarchically higher regions.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexVisual CortexAuditory PerceptionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemory, Short-TermParietal LobeauditorydecodingdistractionfMRImultivariate pattern analysisworking memory

Identifiers

PMID36944488
PMCPMC10162453
OpenAlexW4328051611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.