Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944351›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2023

Demographic Determinants of Residue Profiles of Fungicidal Compounds in Common Voles (

Christian Imholt, Alex Stevens, Peter Edwards, David Woods, Jens Jacob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christian ImholtJulius Kühn-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Cultivated Plants, Münster 48161, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7504-9509
Alex StevensSyngenta Ltd., Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell RG42 6EY, U.K.
Peter EdwardsSyngenta Ltd., Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell RG42 6EY, U.K.
David WoodsCharles River Laboratories, Tranent EH33 2NE, U.K.
Jens JacobJulius Kühn-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Cultivated Plants, Münster 48161, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental risks from plant protection products (PPPs) need to be assessed to ensure safe use. The risk assessments are generally carried out using the common vole as a focal species with conservative theoretical estimates of external exposure. These are then compared to dose-related toxicity endpoints established in toxicity studies, often with laboratory species. The aim of the present study was to determine the actual internal dosimetry of PPPs' active ingredients (AIs) in a population of common voles to provide the basis for informed higher tier risk assessment. As a proof of concept, two fungicidal AIs (fludioxonil and cyprodinil) were investigated using a range of application methodologies. Individuals were treated using oral gavage application (AI dose: 100/200 mg/kg) and fed treated grass (AI sprayed at 2 kg/ha) under laboratory, semi-natural, and natural conditions. Our results show that demographic factors play a significant role in the individual residue profile and that age structure is a key aspect that determines the overall exposure risk of a population. These results are consistent from laboratory to field conditions. Future approaches could establish dose-residue relationships that are reflective of natural food intake rates in wild common vole populations in the risk assessment of PPPs.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaeAnimalsDemographyHumansgeneric focal speciesregistrationrisk assessmenttoxicokinetics

Identifiers

PMID36944351
PMCPMC10077593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.