Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36944346›Full record

ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2023

Early countermeasures to COVID-19 at long-term care facilities in Gwangju Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea.

Hye-Jin Kim, Jieun Kim, Yoon Suk Jang, Hanul Park, Jong Mu Kim, Young Joon Park, So-Yeon Ryu, Jun Hwi Cho, So Yeong Park, Sang-Eun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hye-Jin KimCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
Jieun KimCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
Yoon Suk JangCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
Hanul ParkCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
Jong Mu KimCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
Young Joon ParkCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.
So-Yeon RyuGwangju Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Gwangju, Korea.
Jun Hwi ChoGwangju Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Gwangju, Korea.
So Yeong ParkGwangju Center for Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Gwangju, Korea.
Sang-Eun LeeCOVID-19 National Emergency Response, Central Disease Control Headquarters, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2020, 6231-335-210-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has continued since its first detection in the Republic of Korea on January 20, 2020. This study describes the early countermeasures used to minimize the risk of COVID-19 outbreaks during cohort quarantine and compares the epidemiological characteristics of 2 outbreaks in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in Gwangju Metropolitan City in summer 2020.

methodsAn epidemiological investigation was conducted via direct visits. We investigated epidemiological characteristics, including incidence, morbidity, and mortality rates, for all residents and staff members. Demographic characteristics were analyzed using a statistical program. Additionally, the method of managing infection in LTCFs is described.

resultsResidents and caregivers had high incidence rates in LTCF-A and LTCF-B, respectively. LTCF-B had a longer quarantine period than LTCF-A. The attack rate was 20.02% in LTCF-A and 27.9% in LTCF-B. The mortality rate was 2.3% (1/43) in LTCF-B, the only facility in which a COVID-19 death occurred.

conclusionsExtensive management requires contact minimization, which involves testing all contacts to mitigate further transmission in the early stages of LTCF outbreaks. The findings of this study can help inform and prepare public health authorities for COVID-19 outbreaks, particularly for early control in vulnerable facilities.

Indexed as

Cohort isolationCOVID-19Long-term care facility

Identifiers

PMID36944346
PMCPMC10211439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.