ArticleNeural computation2023
Body Mechanics, Optimality, and Sensory Feedback in the Human Control of Complex Objects.
Article in Neural computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-Assisted Dynamic Interaction of Hemiplegic Upper Limbs with Complex Objects Based on Enhanced Feedforward-Impedance Control.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Dynamical stability and mechanical impedance are optimized when manipulating uncertain dynamically complex objects.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Human-Robot Variable-Impedance Skill Transfer Learning Based on Dynamic Movement Primitives and a Vision System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Human-Aware Control for Physically Interacting Robots.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Simplified internal models in human control of complex objects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Finding the rhythm: Humans exploit nonlinear intrinsic dynamics of compliant systems in periodic interaction tasks.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Human performance in virtual stabilization of a fractional-order system with reaction delay.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Article
- Neural dynamics of delayed feedback in robot teleoperation: insights from fNIRS analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Dynamic primitives in constrained action: systematic changes in the zero-force trajectory.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Inferring control objectives in a virtual balancing task in humans and monkeys.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- A 3D-Printed Device for Unconstrained Grip Force Measurements: Design and Application in a Human Experiment.IEEE transactions on hapticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are adept at a wide variety of motor skills, including the handling of complex objects and using tools. Advances to understand the control of voluntary goal-directed movements have focused on simple behaviors such as reaching, uncoupled to any additional object dynamics. Under these simplified conditions, basic elements of motor control, such as the roles of body mechanics, objective functions, and sensory feedback, have been characterized. However, these elements have mostly been examined in isolation, and the interactions between these elements have received less attention. This study examined a task with internal dynamics, inspired by the daily skill of transporting a cup of coffee, with additional expected or unexpected perturbations to probe the structure of the controller. Using optimal feedback control (OFC) as the basis, it proved necessary to endow the model of the body with mechanical impedance to generate the kinematic features observed in the human experimental data. The addition of mechanical impedance revealed that simulated movements were no longer sensitively dependent on the objective function, a highly debated cornerstone of optimal control. Further, feedforward replay of the control inputs was similarly successful in coping with perturbations as when feedback, or sensory information, was included. These findings suggest that when the control model incorporates a representation of the mechanical properties of the limb, that is, embodies its dynamics, the specific objective function and sensory feedback become less critical, and complex interactions with dynamic objects can be successfully managed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.