Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36943939›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2023

Online veterinary anatomy education during Covid-19 pandemic in Iran: Challenges and opportunities.

Javad Sadeghinezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Javad SadeghinezhadDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0735-8788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe covid-19 pandemic changed veterinary anatomy in-person training to inexperienced virtual training rapidly.

objectivesThis survey was designed to assess the perceptions of first- and second-year Iranian veterinary students on learning outcomes during the online transition.

methodsThe opinions of 684 students were examined using questionnaire.

resultsThe data showed that 23.8% of students were interested in learning anatomy online and 24.8% were satisfied with it. Only 13.5% of the students in the survey generally agree with replacing remote teaching with ordinary training. Less than 1% of students considered online education suitable for the practical part of anatomy. Most of the students' sources for theoretical part included professor's booklets, narrated PowerPoint lectures, in-class notes, and anatomy books. Professors' dissection videos, YouTube videos and also anatomy atlases were the most used sources for practical part. Many students (69.3%) were comfortable using technology. Few numbers of the students (36.1%) were satisfied with the result of the online anatomy exam. Students commented missing dissection, lack of interaction and technology challenges as main negative-points of E-learning. While time management and reviewing the recorded lessons was described as one of the most important benefits.

conclusionsOnline education cannot replace face-to-face education in anatomy and it can be used along ordinary training as an additional educational tool. However, group online learning activities, using dissection videos and 3-D software are suggested for online learning. The data of this study, collected for the first time in Iran, can be used for future decisions in veterinary anatomy.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceAnatomy, VeterinaryAnimalsIranPandemicsCovid-19online learningveterinary anatomy

Identifiers

PMID36943939
PMCPMC10357271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.